Skip to main content
iRubric: HPE & Digital Technologies: Website & Presentation rubric

iRubric: HPE & Digital Technologies: Website & Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
HPE & Digital Technologies: Website & Presentation 
Digital Presentation - PA Core
Research, technology, oral presentation, rubric, health education
Rubric Code: H24X6CB
By JarrydX
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Group Assessment
  Poor

5 pts

Fair

7 pts

Good

9 pts

Excellent

10 pts

Organization

Poor

There is no logical progression of ideas.
Fair

Content is vague and is not presented in a logical progression. This makes it hard to follow the content and main idea.
Good

Content is mostly presented with a logical progression of supporting information.
Excellent

There is a logical progression of ideas.
Relationships

Poor

Few or no content connections made and/or relationships made are vague and need much more explaining to make sense.
Fair

Several connections are missing, and/or the relationship between the survey data and observations and intervention plan is confusing.
Good

Does a good job explaining the relationship between the survey data and observations and the intervention plan, but needs a little more.
Excellent

Does an excellent job explaining the relationship between the survey data and observations and the intervention plan.
Technology Presentation

Poor

Technology distracted from conveying appropriate content.
Use of font, charts, colour graphics, or effects, but these are distracting & interfere with the content presentation.
Fair

Technology did not assist in conveying thoughts well.
Fine use of font, charts, colour graphics, or effects, but these sometimes distract from the content.
Good

Good use of technology to convey thoughts, but it could be improved a little. Good use of font, charts, colour, graphics, or effects to enhance project.
Excellent

Excellent use of technology to convey thoughts. Colour, font, charts, graphics, or effects enhances the project. The layout is visually pleasing and is appropriate for the topic.
Oral Presentation

Poor

Transitions between group members interrupted the flow of the presentation. Group members' contributions were allocated unevenly.
Fair

Transitions between group members somewhat interrupted the flow of the presentation. Group member contributions were allocated unevenly.
Good

Transitions between group members did not impede the flow of the presentation. Group member contributions were allocated somewhat evenly.
Excellent

Transitions between group members were seamless. Group member contributions were allocated evenly.
Resources

Poor

Minimal resources included. Resources are unrelated to the argument. Links and CRAP Tests are inaccurate.
Fair

Some resources were included that somewhat supported the argument. Resources included links and attempted CRAP test.
Good

All three resources included and mostly supported the argument. Resources included links and a CRAP Test.
Excellent

All three resources are included and
strongly support the argument. Resources included links and an accurate CRAP Test.
Individual Assessment
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Oral Presentation

Poor

Poor communication skills. The individual used poor verbal and no visual communication skills to convey their argument.
Fair

Fair communication skills. The individual used verbal and little to no visual communication skills to convey their argument.
Good

Good communication skills. The individual used verbal and some visual communication skills to convey their argument.
Excellent

Excellent communication skills. The individual used verbal and visual communication skills to convey their argument.
Evaluation

Poor

Poor reflection. The individual's responses are confusing and don't show an understanding of areas they did well with and areas that could be improved.
Fair

Fair reflection. The individual shows some understanding of areas they did well with; improvements are somewhat confusing.
Good

Good reflection. The individual recognises areas they did well with and some areas that could be improved in their project
Excellent

Excellent reflection. The individual recognises areas they did well with and areas that could be improved in their project
Participation & Collaboration

Poor

Poor participation. The individual completed minimal group responsibilities.
Fair

Fair participation. The individual mostly completed their group responsibilities.
Good

Good participation. The individual mostly completed their group responsibilities.
Excellent

Excellent participation. The individual completed all their group responsibilities.



Keywords:
  • Digital Presentation, Health Campaign



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98