Skip to main content
iRubric: Research Proposal Introduction rubric

iRubric: Research Proposal Introduction rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Research Proposal Introduction 
Research Proposal Introduction
The rubic is used to appraise the introductory research paper that specifies a topic of interest; identifies a problem; proposes a need for a study; formulates a research hypothesis and provides preliminary background data in the form of a review of literature.
Rubric Code: GXX7529
By Jeatlaw
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Introduction

Excellent

Well formulated introduction based on facts that are supported with 5 or more strong sources of evidence specific to the topic.
Good

Fairly well formulated introduction that has some evidence to support the topic but the evidence is a mixture of strong and weak sources.
fair

Introduction is not well constructed and provides a few (less than 5) sources of weak evidence to support the topic.
Poor

Lacks a proper introduction. There is no substantive evidence to support the topic
Problem Statement

Excellent

Very clearly posed statement of the problem and supported with high quality (strong) evidence.
Good

Fairly well posed statement of the problem that provides evidence but the evidence is not as strong as it could be.
fair

Statement of the problem is not clearly stated and/or lacks quality evidence to support the problem
Poor

Lacks a proper statement of the problem.

Evidence presented does not support the thesis or problem statement.
Purpose of Study

Excellent

Very clearly stated purpose of the study that connects very well to the introduction and the statement of the problem.
Good

Fairly well stated purpose of the study that connects well to the introduction and the statement of the problem.
fair

Purpose of the study is not clearly stated and/or does not connect well with the introduction and the statement of the problem.
Poor

Lacks a purpose of the study statement or does not pertain to the introduction and/or the statement of the problem.
Research Hypothesis

Excellent

Well stated research hypothesis based on the purpose of the study. Follows and meets all the guidelines for hypothesis development.
Good

Fairly well stated hypothesis based on the purpose of the study. Follows and meets greater than 80% of the guidelines for hypothesis development.
fair

Stated hypothesis is unclear based on the purpose of the study. Meets less than 80% of the guidelines for hypothesis development.
Poor

Lacks a hypothesis or the hypothesis presented does not support the purpose of the study. Fails to use the guidelines for hypothesis development.
Review of the literature

Excellent

Comprehensive review of the literature using quality evidence and specifically analyzes the research conducted by describing the individual studies and findings that support the thesis and focused problem. A minimum of 10 quality references included.
Good

Comprehensive review of the literature using quality evidence but does not adequately analyze the research findings; simply reports on the literature. A minimum of 8 quality references included.
fair

Superficial review of the literature that does not describe the research findings; relies heavily on a few studies and uses poor quality resources for information gathering Less than 8 quality references included.
Poor

Superficial review of the literature that is poorly organized and lacks credibility based on the level of evidence and resources presented. Less than 5 references included.
Writing Mechanics

Excellent

Very well written paper with few grammatical errors. Adheres to all the proposal writing format requirements as presented in the guidelines.
Good

Well written paper with few grammatical errors. Adheres to most of the proposal writing format requirements as presented in the guidelines.
fair

Fairly written paper that lacks clarity; has poor transition sentences. There are several grammatical errors. Adheres to most of the proposal writing format requirements as presented in the guidelines.
Poor

Poorly written paper that lacks organization. There are multiple grammatical errors. Fails to adhere to the proposal writing format requirements as presented in the guidelines.



Keywords:
  • research proposal

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98