Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Mock Trial Rubric--Lawyers
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Mock Trial Rubric--Lawyers
Mock Trial Rubric--Lawyers
This rubric will evaluate the participation of a student based on preparedness, behavior, attitude, attendance, and social interaction while preparing for the criminal justice law mock trial.
Rubric Code:
GXC6A93
By
Tim_Smith
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Law
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Class Part./Att.
Excellent
20 pts
Above Average
17 pts
Average
15 pts
Poor
12 pts
Active Involvement
Excellent
Student is constantly engaged in the motions or proceedings. Frequently appraises, assesses, and analyzes evidence and introduces timely and relevant objections and motions.
Above Average
Student is often engaged in the motions or proceedings. Student could participate more by making additional timely and relevant objections and motions.
Average
Student is engaged in the process but needs regular reminders to get back on task and make motions and objections. Student can be distracting to teacher and classmates.
Poor
Student is not involved with the class activity. Student needs constant reminders to get back on task. Student is distracting to the class as a whole.
Preparation
Excellent
Student formulated research and assembled relevant briefs, motions, and information for the class. Student evaluates information and can compare and contrast facts while synthesizing them with the law.
Above Average
Student usually completes research and/or is ready with required materials for the class. Student gathers and evaluates most of the facts and can incorporate them with the relevant law.
Average
Student sometimes completes research and/or has materials. Student comprehends the idea of comparing and contrasting law with facts and usually applies the proper facts to the correct law.
Poor
Student did not complete required research and/or assignments. Student contributed little or nothing at all to the overall activity. Student is not able to apply the facts to the relevant law.
Performance
Excellent
Student talks clearly, loud enough for all to hear; was confident and persuasive in their opening/closing statements; asked relevent questions in direct and cross examination effectively; answered all questions put forth; rarely or did not use notes. Compared and contrasted law with facts.
Above Average
Student spoke clearly most of the time; was loud enough most of the time; was confident and persuasive in their opening/closing statements most of the time; asked relevent questions most of the time effectively; answered almost all questions posed; used notes at times.
Average
Student mumbled at times; spoke quietly some of the time; at times lacked confidence and persuasiveness in opening/closing statements; did not ask relevent questions or was ineffective in asking questions; answered many questions posed; used notes often.
Poor
Student was difficult to hear; student was not confident or persuasive in opening/closing statements; student did not ask relevent questions; could answer few questions posed by teacher or class; used notes most of the time.
Attitude
Excellent
Student is positive about the activities being learned in class and sets the example for students around him/her.
Above Average
Student is positive about the activities being done in class.
Average
Student is neutral about the activities. Student spreads mixed feelings around the class, both positive and negative.
Poor
Student has a negative attitude. Student makes the experience bad for others around him/her.
Work Product
Excellent
Student had opening and closing statements well prepared; had a complete list of questions for direct and cross examination; developed effective arguments and trial strategies;distinguished roles of judge and jury & prosecution and defense perfectly
Above Average
Student had a good opening/closing statement prepared; had a good list of questions for direct and cross examination; distinguished most of the duties between judge and jury; prosecution and defense
Average
Student had acceptable opening/closing statements prepared; student had an incomplete list of questions for direct/cross examination;distinguished some of the duties between judge and jury and between roles of prosecution and defense
Poor
Student had poor opening/closing statements prepared; student did not have a complete list of questions; could not distinguish roles of judge or jury or other significant courtroom personnel
Keywords:
criminal pre trial and courtroom primer
Subjects:
English
Law
Music
Types:
Presentation
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.