- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: 1960s Presidential Debate rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
1960s Presidential Debate Candidate History Rubric Code: GXA3W5A By Benmen19 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Political Science Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Candidate History
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Writing Assignment	Poor The students writing does not, in any way, describe a candidate in the 1960s, has improper grammar, and does not meet the length requirement. The writing does not contain the candidate's early life or personal achievements.	Fair The students writing somewhat describes a candidate of the 1960s but the grammar and length requirement needs improvement. The writing contains the candidate's early life but not his/her personal achievements.	Good The students writing clearly describes a candidate of the 1960s history and meets both the grammar and length requirements but could be a bit more creative. The writing contains the candidate's early life and personal achievements.	Excellent The students writing is clear and creative. The candidate's history is thought out and reflects the students knowledge of the 1960s candidate. The writing contains the candidate's early life and personal achievements.
Presentation	Poor The group does not command the space and does not give any detail of the Candidate's personal life or achievements.	Fair The group somewhat commands the space but does not give any detail of the Candidate's personal life or achievements.	Good The group commands the space and gives some details of the Candidate's life but leaves out the personal achievements.	Excellent The group commands the space, gives details of the Canididate's life and personal achievements.
Group Work	Poor The group does not include everyone in their decision making and consistently fights over the project. Some students are not engaged at all in the project.	Fair The group includes everyone in the decision making but some fighting over tone exist. Some students are not engaged in the project.	Good The group includes everyone in the decision making and no one fights over the process. However, some students are not engaged in the project.	Excellent The group includes everyone in the decision making and no one fights over the process. All students are engaged and properly working on the project.