Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Presentation of Website/App rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Presentation of Website/App
Presentation Rubric Website/App
Students will create a Media/Technology presentation featuring an app/and or website that benefits the classroom (describe, explain, showcase) & then design an assignment or activity that they can implement the app/website. Include age/grade level, rationale, and how it would benefit your future classroom instruction. To present, use tools like: Web 2.0 tools, Prezi, Glogster, Google Slides, PowToon, Animoto, a movie software, etc.
Rubric Code:
GXA3C56
By
norchavarria
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Media/Technology Presentation
Exceeds
10 pts
Good
8 pts
Fair
7 pts
Poor
5 pts
Content
Exceeds
The project includes all relevant information to the theme (age/grade level, rationale in a well organized fashion. Sections are all connected. Project is developed taking into consideration the educational level of learner.
Good
The media project includes all relevant information. However, it is somewhat organized. Project is developed taking into consideration the educational level.
Fair
Does not have relevant information on the theme. There is not enough information presented. Information is disorganized. Project takes into consideration the educational levels.
Poor
The media project is lacking elements required. There are many gaps in information presented. Project does not takes into consideration the educational level .
Organization
Exceeds
Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material.
Good
Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed.
Fair
Content is logically organized for the most part.
Poor
There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.
Originality
Exceeds
Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive.
Good
Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.
Fair
Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking.
Poor
Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit.
Age/Grade/Rationale & benefit to cl
Exceeds
The project includes all of 4 components of the following information:
age, grade, rationale & benefit to classroom.
Good
The project includes 3 of the 4 components of the following information:
age, grade, rationale & benefit to classroom.
Fair
The project includes 2 of the of 4 components of the following information:
age, grade, rationale & benefit to classroom.
Poor
The project includes 1 components of the following information:
age, grade, rationale & benefit to classroom.
Work quality/effort/style
Exceeds
The work done demonstrates that the learner is proud of his/her work. Effort exceeds expectation. The project has an element of creativity and style, and is not just a list of facts. Project is presented in a clear and concise manner demonstrating full understanding of the theme.
Good
The work was done with good effort. Time put into this project is appropriate.The project is clear and logical and contains facts as well as very few mistakes. Good clear presentation.
Fair
Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the future teacher is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed.The project lacks style and reads more like a list of facts than a practical theme. Lacks neatness and clarity.
Poor
Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the future teacher is capable of. Work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.The project lacks a clear understanding of the theme and their are many errors. Project is not creative.
Research and technology tool
Exceeds
The project demonstrates a level of understanding that exceeds the expectation of this assignment. Adequate use of technology tool.
Good
The student provides a clear presentation of the information. This is in their own words. Adequate use of technology tool.
Fair
There are several confusing moments and the information presented is not completely shared during the presentation. Hesitant use of technology tool.
Poor
The information that is presented lacks many elements of what is expected. Technology tool chosen does not convey the theme correctly. Power Point used without interactive features.
Oral Presentation
Exceeds
Interesting, well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.
Good
Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention.
Fair
Delivery not smooth, but able to hold audience attention most of the time.
Poor
Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost.
Usefulness
Exceeds
The app/website is a useful tool for a classroom and could be implemented easily after watching this presentation.
Good
The app/website is a useful tool for a classroom and might be implemented with some ease after watching this presentation.
Fair
The app/website is a useful tool for a classroom and might be implemented with little ease after watching this presentation.
Poor
The app/website is a useful tool for a classroom but it would be extremely difficult to implement after watching this presentation.
Mechanics
Exceeds
No misspellings or grammatical errors.
Good
Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors.
Fair
Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
Poor
More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar.
Citation of sources
Exceeds
Sources of project have been correctly cited.
Good
Sources of project have been adequately cited.
Fair
Citation of sources is limited.
Poor
Sources have not been cited.
Keywords:
Multi media representation
Subjects:
English
Geology
Social Sciences
Education
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.