- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Research Pathophysiology rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Research Pathophysiology Research Methods Final Narrative Exam Rubric Rubric Code: G23CW44 By calamilla Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Graduate

Categories
	Poor (N/A)	Below Average (N/A)	Acceptable (N/A)	Outstanding (N/A)
Content/Patho	Poor Well below expectations. Content general, not concise. Offers generalities. Off topic	Below Average Somewhat below average for expectations. Content generally focused, may be verbose at times. Content lacks explanation, clarity, accuracy and/or relevance.	Acceptable Meets expectations at acceptable level. Focused content, well explained, demonstrates understanding of concepts. Few errors in accuracy.	Outstanding Excellent demonstration of knowledge. Concise, well focused. Outstanding choice of content used to describe pathophysiology.
Critical Thought	Poor Substantially below expectations. No argument/thesis present or overally general. Represents opinion, not scientific argument	Below Average Below average for expectations. Some foundation for argument present. Lacks evidence of critical thinking, analysis, synthesis of ideas, and/or breadth or depth of thought toward question.	Acceptable Meets expectations at acceptable level. Focused argument for questions. Stays on topic, brings in alternative views where appropriate. Demonstrates sound reasoning and critical thinking with depth and breadth.	Outstanding Excellent. Synthesizes info., pulls together new and original ideas. Demonstrates important insights, and sophisticated thought. Outstanding evidence of critical thinking.
Writing	Poor Substantially below expectations. Poor demonstration of scientific writing. Problems with sentence/paragraph structure, spelling, etc. Did not follow outline	Below Average Below average. Weak paragraph and/or sentence structure. May be spelling, grammar or other writing errors. Somewhat followed outline.	Acceptable Acceptable Generally demonstrates good scientific writing style, form and content. Few errors in formatting, style, etc. Mostly followed outline.	Outstanding Excellent Outstanding demonstration of scientific writing. Clear, well organized writing with very few errors in writing. Followed outline.
AMA format	Poor Did not use AMA format	Below Average Below average use of intext citations and references per AMA format.	Acceptable Acceptable use of intext citations and references per AMA format..	Outstanding Excellent use of intext citations and references per AMA format.