Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER
POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER
POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER
Rubric Code:
G22B2X7
By
mpaxton70
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Political Science
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Policy Analysis Paper
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
4.5 pts
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
4 pts
BELOW EXPECTATIONS
3 pts
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
2 pts
Introduction of Problem/Policy
3 pts
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
Problem and/or existing policy is thoroughly described. The history of the problem/policy is included. Key terms, stakeholders and policy areas needing analysis and resolution are defined.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
Presents a well-considered position on the issue.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS
Presents a vague or limited position on the issue.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Is unclear or seriously limited in presenting or developing a position on the issue.
Policy Environment
3 pts
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
Evaluative review of the policy is included. All relevant factors affecting the policy are addressed. Ambiguities, conflicts, problems, and contradictions related to the policies are explained.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
Explains the factors impacting the policy with logically sound reasons and/or well-chosen examples.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS
Explains most of the factors impacting the policy with relevant reasons and/or examples.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Is weak in the use of relevant reasons or examples.
Current Policy (or lack thereof)
3 pts
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
Clarifies the underlying assumptions and effectiveness of the current policy, including, effects on and roles of key stakeholders. Assesses the efficiency of the current policy
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
Discussion is focused and generally well-organized, connecting ideas appropriately. The efficiency of the current policy is assessed.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS
Is poorly focused and/or poorly-organized. Does not adequately assess the efficiency of the current policy.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Is unfocused and/or disorganized. Does not assess the efficiency of the current policy.
Policy Alternatives
3 pts
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
Three or more alternatives to the current policy are presented. A thorough cost-benefit analysis is provided for each policy alternative.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
Two or more alternatives to the current policy are presented. An adequate cost-benefit analysis is included for each policy alternative.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS
One alternative to the current policy is presented. An cost-benefit analysis is included for the policy alternative
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
One alternative to the current policy is presented. An poor cost-benefit analysis is included for the policy alternative or no cost-benefit analysis was included.
Written Communication
3 pts
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
Excellent mechanics, grammar, word usage. Language is clear and appropriate. Writing style is effective.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
Expresses ideas clearly and well, using appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety. May have errors in mechanics, grammar, or word usage.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS
Expresses ideas with reasonable clarity. Contains significant errors in mechanics, grammar, or word usage.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Has problems in language and sentence structure that result in a lack of clarity.Contains major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics.
Strength of analysis
2.5 pts
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
Each assertion is supported with researchable and verifiable support from reputable sources. No bias is evident in the analysis.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
Assertions are generally well-researched and supported by appropriate reference materials. No bias is evident in the analysis.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS
Some evidence is provided to support many of the assertions, but not all. Reference materials may be inappropriate.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Weak evidence is provided to support some of the assertions. The analysis is biased.
Format
2.5 pts
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
The paper includes all required six basic elements: title page, executive summary, table of contents, text, reference page and appendices. The text of the paper is approximately 9-10 pages in length.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
The paper includes all required six basic elements: title page, executive summary, table of contents, text, reference page and appendices. The text of the paper is 6-8 pages in length.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS
The paper includes most of the required elements, but may be disorganized. And/or the text of the paper is approximately 4-5 pages.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
The text of the paper is less than 4 pages and does not include the required elements and/or is disorganized.
.
Citations
2.5 pts
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
Support and evidence are referenced using paraphrasing in the students own voice and are cited properly within the text of the paper.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
Support and evidence are referenced using paraphrasing in the students own voice and most are cited properly within the text of the paper.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS
Support and evidence are referenced using paraphrasing in the students own voice - citations are not properly formatted.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
The student uses language that is not his/her own and does not provide citations for support.
Research skills
2.5 pts
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
Paper uses at least 8 scholarly sources. Clear evidence of primary research.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
Paper uses at least 6 scholarly sources.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS
Paper uses at least 4 scholarly sources.
OR
No evidence of primary research.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
Paper uses less than 4 scholarly sources.
Subjects:
English
Political Science
Social Sciences
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.