Skip to main content
iRubric: POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER rubric

iRubric: POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER 
POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER
Rubric Code: G22B2X7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Political Science  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Policy Analysis Paper
  EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

4.5 pts

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

4 pts

BELOW EXPECTATIONS

3 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

2 pts

Introduction of Problem/Policy
3 pts

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Problem and/or existing policy is thoroughly described. The history of the problem/policy is included. Key terms, stakeholders and policy areas needing analysis and resolution are defined.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Presents a well-considered position on the issue.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS

Presents a vague or limited position on the issue.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Is unclear or seriously limited in presenting or developing a position on the issue.
Policy Environment
3 pts

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Evaluative review of the policy is included. All relevant factors affecting the policy are addressed. Ambiguities, conflicts, problems, and contradictions related to the policies are explained.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Explains the factors impacting the policy with logically sound reasons and/or well-chosen examples.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS

Explains most of the factors impacting the policy with relevant reasons and/or examples.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Is weak in the use of relevant reasons or examples.
Current Policy (or lack thereof)
3 pts

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Clarifies the underlying assumptions and effectiveness of the current policy, including, effects on and roles of key stakeholders. Assesses the efficiency of the current policy
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Discussion is focused and generally well-organized, connecting ideas appropriately. The efficiency of the current policy is assessed.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS

Is poorly focused and/or poorly-organized. Does not adequately assess the efficiency of the current policy.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Is unfocused and/or disorganized. Does not assess the efficiency of the current policy.
Policy Alternatives
3 pts

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Three or more alternatives to the current policy are presented. A thorough cost-benefit analysis is provided for each policy alternative.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Two or more alternatives to the current policy are presented. An adequate cost-benefit analysis is included for each policy alternative.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS

One alternative to the current policy is presented. An cost-benefit analysis is included for the policy alternative
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

One alternative to the current policy is presented. An poor cost-benefit analysis is included for the policy alternative or no cost-benefit analysis was included.
Written Communication
3 pts

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Excellent mechanics, grammar, word usage. Language is clear and appropriate. Writing style is effective.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Expresses ideas clearly and well, using appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety. May have errors in mechanics, grammar, or word usage.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS

Expresses ideas with reasonable clarity. Contains significant errors in mechanics, grammar, or word usage.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Has problems in language and sentence structure that result in a lack of clarity.Contains major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics.
Strength of analysis
2.5 pts

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Each assertion is supported with researchable and verifiable support from reputable sources. No bias is evident in the analysis.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Assertions are generally well-researched and supported by appropriate reference materials. No bias is evident in the analysis.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS

Some evidence is provided to support many of the assertions, but not all. Reference materials may be inappropriate.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Weak evidence is provided to support some of the assertions. The analysis is biased.
Format
2.5 pts

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

The paper includes all required six basic elements: title page, executive summary, table of contents, text, reference page and appendices. The text of the paper is approximately 9-10 pages in length.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

The paper includes all required six basic elements: title page, executive summary, table of contents, text, reference page and appendices. The text of the paper is 6-8 pages in length.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS

The paper includes most of the required elements, but may be disorganized. And/or the text of the paper is approximately 4-5 pages.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

The text of the paper is less than 4 pages and does not include the required elements and/or is disorganized.














.
Citations
2.5 pts

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Support and evidence are referenced using paraphrasing in the students own voice and are cited properly within the text of the paper.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Support and evidence are referenced using paraphrasing in the students own voice and most are cited properly within the text of the paper.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS

Support and evidence are referenced using paraphrasing in the students own voice - citations are not properly formatted.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

The student uses language that is not his/her own and does not provide citations for support.
Research skills
2.5 pts

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS

Paper uses at least 8 scholarly sources. Clear evidence of primary research.
MEETS EXPECTATIONS

Paper uses at least 6 scholarly sources.
BELOW EXPECTATIONS

Paper uses at least 4 scholarly sources.
OR
No evidence of primary research.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Paper uses less than 4 scholarly sources.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98