Skip to main content
iRubric: Video Game Portfolio rubric

iRubric: Video Game Portfolio rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Video Game Portfolio 
Portfolio and Presentation Assessment
SWBAT use Adobe Spark, (Webpage) to create their video game projects portfolio. It should highlight their projects (like & dislikes). There should be a minimum of 3 projects. (some students were not here both semesters). Portfolio hightlights the intent and purpose of each project, and has student reflections. The reflections should be at least 2 paragraphs minimum.
Rubric Code: G226BCW
By Ratmany007
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: ePortfolio  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Portfolio and Presentation
Enter rubric description
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Portfolio Content

Excellent

Portfolio is compiled of all original & completed projects created by the student, portfolio shows thought & flows well, there is more than 3 projects.
Project purpose/goal & reflection is attached with complete sentences.
Good

Portfolio includes some original artworks that are complete or close to completed artworks created by the student. Portfolio shows thought & flows well, there are 3 projects.
Project purpose/goal & reflection is attached with complete sentences.
Fair

Portfolio includes most original artworks & summary/reflection is partial/incomplete.
Poor

Portfolio includes very little to no past projects and summary/reflection work is missing/or semi-complete.
Creativity

Did student use a higher
level of creativity
throughout the design
process and presentation?
Excellent

High level of creativity in the design process. Portfolio presents an interesting or
creative approach. Student used design tactics to attract & hold viewer's interest.
Great use of Adobe Spark WebPage space and capabilities.
Good

Displays moderate level of
creativity in the design process in the portfolio. Student used some design tactics to attract & hold viewer's interest.
Some use of Adobe Spark WebPage space and techniques.
Fair

Minimal levels of creativity shown in the project design. Student used little design tactics to attract & hold viewer's interest.
Little use of Adobe Spark WebPage space and techniques.
Poor

No effort put into creativity of project portfolio design. Very, to no use of Adobe Spark WebPage layout and design.
Content

Excellent

Content includes components from all lessons within unit, review of said project(what is the purpose/goal of project), identification of artistic techniques in works, & summary of challenges involved in creating portfolio. Student shows knowledge of subject.
Good

Content includes components from some lessons within unit, review of said project(what is the purpose/goal of project), identification of artistic techniques in works, & summary of challenges involved in creating portfolio. Student shows some knowledge of subject.
Fair

Content includes at least one component from lessons within unit, some aspect of the goal of each project, attempts to identify artistic techniques, and summarizes challenges involved in creating portfolio. Student shows little knowledge of subject.
Poor

Content includes incomplete components from lessons within unit, if at all, lacks goal purpose of said projects used in portfolio, lacks technique identification, and poorly summarizes challenges involved in creating portfolio. Student show little to no knowledge of the subject.
Project Completion

Did student complete the
entire project, with guidelines in mind?
Excellent

Students have demonstrated & executed a well thought out portfolio, with detailed and opinionated feedback involving reflection/criticism on technique and craftsmanship of their own products.
Project is complete.
Good

Students have demonstrated & executed a great portfolio, with some detailed & opinionated feedback involving reflection/criticism on technique & craftsmanship of their own products.
Project satisfies the end goal.
Fair

Students has some feedback involving reflection/criticism on technique & craftsmanship of their own products.
Project satisfies the end goal.
Poor

Students did not put in effort, or time into portfolio. It is lacking in 3 or more elements.
The portfolio is very cluttered in thought process and has little to no functionality.
Understanding

Did student understand a solid understanding of Adobe Spark usage in development of the portfolio and designed accordingly?
Excellent

Student demonstrates a keen knowledge about project requirements & Adobe Spark. The portfolio presented encompasses all criteria & student has met or exceeded intended purpose of their final project.
Good

Student demonstrates some knowledge but offers little specifics of the project
and/or design process as displayed in the portfolio
Fair

Student demonstrates knowledge but offers not enough specifics of the project
and/or design process as displayed in the portfolio.
Poor

Student demonstrates little to no understanding of Adobe Spark & portfolio feels incomplete/rushed.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98