Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Polling Project Presentation Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Polling Project Presentation Rubric
Polling Project Presentation Rubric
Rubric Code:
FXCWA74
By
wendypeer
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Political Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Final Project-based learning Rubric
Excellent
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
2 pts
Missing parts/no attempt
0 pts
Organization
Excellent
Presentation was very organized and was very easy to follow. Transitions between group members were well planned and executed cleanly.
Good
Presentation was fairly organized and fairly followable. Transitions might have been slightly discontinuous but did not take away greatly from the overall presentation.
Fair
Presentation was not clearly organized. Transitions between members were jumpy or awkward.
Poor
Presentation lacked organization. Poor transitions between group members individual parts. Presentation lacked order and very difficult to follow.
Missing parts/no attempt
No attempt made.
Teamwork/Participation
Excellent
The group worked very well with each other and the presentation was shared equally among the group members.
Good
The group worked well with each other and communicated well. Some members participated slightly more than others.
Fair
Group communicated relatively well with a few lapses in the presentation; some students dominated the presentation and others did not participate much.
Poor
Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications and lapses in the presentation.
Missing parts/no attempt
No attempt made.
Power Point Slides
Excellent
Slides are attractive. Text is easy to read. Graphics and effects enhance throughout the presentation. Images consistently support the content.
Good
Slides are attractive. Text is easy to read. Graphics and effects enhance more than half of the presentation. Images adequately support the content.
Fair
Slides are somewhat easy to read. Slides are too crowded with text. Images support the content at times.
Poor
Slides are not easy to read. Very few graphics enhance the presentation. Images consistently do not support the content.
Missing parts/no attempt
No attempt made
Graphs Slides
Excellent
Graphs are attractive. Text is easy to read. Graphics and effects enhance throughout the presentation. Images consistently support the data.
Good
Graphs are attractive. Text is easy to read. Graphics and effects enhance more than half of the presentation. Images adequately support the data.
Fair
Graphs are somewhat easy to read. Graphs are too crowded with text. Images support the data at times.
Poor
Graphs are not easy to read. Very few graphics enhance the presentation. Images consistently do not support the data.
Missing parts/no attempt
No attempt made.
Conclusions
Excellent
Data supports them consistently. No mistakes were made with regard to data in the conclusion.
Good
Data supports them fairly consistently. Missing minor data elements or contained minor errors in the conclusion.
Fair
Group members had only a superficial understanding of data and several data mistakes were made during the conclusion.
Poor
Group members had little to no understanding of the data addressed in the conclusion.
Missing parts/no attempt
No attempt made.
Required Materials
Excellent
Group submitted required materials on time: Candidate's response to the 5 questions, the polling data for each question, and the self/peer evaluation sheet.
Good
Group submitted required materials late: Candidate's response to the 5 questions, the polling data for each question, and the self/peer evaluation sheet.
Fair
Group missing all required materials.
Poor
Group missing two required materials.
Missing parts/no attempt
Group missing all required materials.
Total Points
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Missing parts/no attempt
Subjects:
Math
Political Science
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Math rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.