- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: AP Physics 1 Lab Report Rubric - PASCAR collisions

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
AP Physics 1 Lab Report Rubric - PASCAR collisions AP Physics 1 Lab Report Rubric - Springs and things Physics Lab Report Rubric Rubric Code: FX77C87 By izifundo Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Physics Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Physics Lab Report Rubric
	Excellent (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Poor (N/A)
Results - Data (30 marks)	Excellent Data is presented in professional looking table or chart. Table or chart is accurate and complete, and labeled with appropriate units and titles. Velocity vector diagrams.	Good Minor errors or omissions	Fair Data is presented accurately but in improper format (i.e. in written form but no tables or charts) and/or major errors or omissions	Poor Data is not presented accurately or is missing and demonstrating minimal effort.
Results - Calculations (20 marks)	Excellent All calculations for one complete trial are clearly and correctly shown and the results labeled with the appropriate units. Law of conservation calculation Calculation to show if collision is elastic or inelastic	Good Minor error and/or omissions.	Fair Very few of required calculations are shown. Calculations reflect major errors or omissions	Poor Calculations are missing completely, demonstrating minimal effort.
Discussion - Analysis (40 marks)	Excellent Discussion is detailed and includes the relationship between trends/patterns seen, a thorough discussion of the data, and analysis of graphs. Lab questions are answered correctly, thoroughly and clearly.	Good Somewhat detailed and/or minor errors or omissions.	Fair Brief and/or major errors or omissions Overall, section is not very thoroughly done.	Poor Analysis questions responses are missing completely, demonstrating minimal effort.
Discussion - Conclusion (10 marks)	Excellent Clear and concise conclusions are given. Conclusion addresses problem/objective and states knowledge gained. Errors are identified and thoroughly discussed.	Good Conclusions are present and complete, knowledge gained in present, discussion of errors present, but is not clear and precise. Minor errors and/or omissions	Fair Conclusion is missing parts and/or knowledge gained. Conclusion has major errors or omissions.	Poor Conclusion is missing completely, demonstrating minimal effort.