Skip to main content
iRubric: Glogster rubric

iRubric: Glogster rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Glogster 
This is a rubric used to assess a Glogster project on Differences in access to resources in Argentina, and for the students to use as a guide when completing their Glogster assignments. From EDU GLOGSTER educator resource guide
Rubric Code: F2XW384
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Glogster
  Excellent

6 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

2 pts

Needs Improvement

0 pts

Graphics/ Pictures

Excellent

Graphics are related to the theme/purpose <BR>
of the Glog, are <BR>
cropped and sized, are of high quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Good

Graphics are related to the theme/purpose <BR>
of the Glog, are <BR>
of good qual- <BR>
ity and enhance <BR>
reader interest or <BR>
understanding.
Fair

Graphics are related to the theme/purpose <BR>
of the Glog, and are of good quality.
Needs Improvement

Graphics seem <BR>
randomly chosen, are of low quality, OR <BR>
distract the reader.
Youtube or podcast

Excellent

Music, audio clips and/ <BR>
or sounds are thoughtfully edited and used only where they <BR>
add to reader <BR>
understanding of the content.
Good

Music, audio clips and/or sounds are used <BR>
only where they add to reader understanding of the content.
Fair

Music, audio clips and/ <BR>
or sounds are thoughtfully <BR>
edited and used, but 1 or 2 detracted from the <BR>
overall Glog.
Needs Improvement

Music, audio clips and/or <BR>
sounds were seemingly used randomly OR <BR>
typically detracted from the overall Glog.
Content

Excellent

The site has a well-stated <BR>
clear purpose and tells us relevant information about the topic
Good

The Glog has a clearly stated purpose and <BR>
tells us about the topic, but may have one or two elements that do not seem to be related to it.
Fair

The purpose is some- what muddy or vague.
Needs Improvement

The Glog lacks a purpose and does not tell us much about the topic.
Attractiveness

Excellent

The Glog looks very attractive due to an adequate usage of images, fonts, and information.
Good

The Glog looks quite attractive due to an adequate usage of images, fonts, and information.
Fair

The Glog looks attractive due to an adequate usage of images, fonts, and information.
Needs Improvement

The Glog does not look attractive due to an inadequate usage of images, fonts, and information.
Target Language

Excellent

Target language has been accurately used. Not many mistakes in usage (1-2 maximum).
Good

Target language has been accurately used.Some mistakes in usage (3-4 maximum).
Fair

Target language has been somewhat accurately used. Some mistakes in usage (5-6 maximum)
Needs Improvement

Target language has not been accurately used. Many mistakes in usage (more than 6).



Keywords:
  • Glog, Web2.0, poster, multimedia

Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16