Skip to main content
iRubric: Soap Note Grading Rubric for University of the Cumberlands

iRubric: Soap Note Grading Rubric for University of the Cumberlands

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Soap Note Grading Rubric for University of the Cumberlands 
Rubric designed to evaluate soap notes by graduate nursing students attending University of the Cumberlands Nurse Practitioner program
Rubric Code: EXC6C93
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Soap Note Grading Rubric
  Below Average

1 pts

Average

2 pts

Above Average

3 pts

Exceptional

4 pts

Documentation is clear and well org

Below Average

Documentation does not meet expectations for the graduate level as evidenced by either of the following:<BR>
lay terminology, illogical sequencing, missing essential elements, and/or more than 2 spelling or grammatical errors.
Average

Documentation meets criteria for clarity but needs to be better organized.<BR>
Documentation occasionally strays from standard format for SOAP documentation.<BR>
Narratives such as the HPI and Exam occasionally stray from logical sequence but the reader is able to determine findings with minimal difficulty.
Above Average

Documentation meets criteria for "exceptional" but there is occasional redundant or distracting information. Documentation meets criteria for clarity but needs to be better organized.<BR>
Documentation occasionally strays from standard format for SOAP documentation.
Exceptional

Documentation is clear and well organized.<BR>
Appropriate medical terminology is used.<BR>
Redundant (repetitious) words, phrases, and other distracting information are omitted.<BR>
Format follows a standard. Narratives such as the HPI and Exam have a logical flow.
Subjective assessment is fully expl

Below Average

Subjective assessment is missing more than 2 critical elements needed for adequate evaluation of the patient's problem. Irrelevant information predominates subjective assessment
Average

Subjective assessment is missing 2 elements needed for adequate evaluation of the patient's problem. Includes irrelevant information.
Above Average

Subjective assessment is missing 1 element needed for adequate evaluation of the patient's problem.
Exceptional

Subjective assessment of health status is fully explicated<BR>
CC and HPI are targeted toward the reason for presentation without the inclusion of extraneous information.<BR>
CC is succinct.<BR>
HPI is fully developed and includes location, duration, timing, character, severity provocative/palliative factors and/or other features appropriate for the reason for presentation.<BR>
Elements of the PMH, FH, and ROS that expand on the CC and HPI are included.
Objective assessment is fully expli

Below Average

Objective assessment is not developed and/or the assessment is inappropriate for the patient's age, gender, and/or inappropriate for the presenting problem.
Average

Two or more elements needed for adequate evaluation of a patient's problem is missing from the subjective and/or objective assessment.<BR>
Selection of diagnostic tests is inappropriate for CC or is missing when needed.
Above Average

Objective assessment is missing an element needed for adequate evaluation of the patient's problem.<BR>
Includes irrelevant information<BR>
Selection of diagnostic tests is too broad or expensive for evaluating the presenting problem OR<BR>
Selection of diagnostic tests is inadequate to address the presenting problem
Exceptional

Objective assessment of health status is fully explicated<BR>
Physical exam includes vital signs, height and weight for all children and for others as appropriate, and any relevant developmental data related to assessment of CC.<BR>
Appropriate diagnostic tests are performed/ordered.
Diagnoses are adequate, coherent, a

Below Average

Lacks differential diagnoses and/or final diagnosis is inappropriate or unacceptable for subjective and objective assessment
Average

Limited differential diagnoses considered and/or final diagnoses only minimally applicable for subjective and objective assessment
Above Average

Minimum of 5 differential diagnoses considered and appropriate final diagnoses selected for subjective and objective assessment
Exceptional

Greater than 5 appropriate differential diagnoses considered and evidence that final diagnoses was determined utilizing evidence-based research as applied to subjective and objective assessments
Plan is coherent, complete, and afi

Below Average

Plan is inappropriate, lacking essential components related to final diagnoses, or neglects patient education and follow-up.
Average

Plan is inadequate to fully address the identified problem.expansive or overwhelming for the client or healthcare system OR<BR>
Needs to consider alternative features for optimal outcomes
Above Average

Plan is appropriate and meets above criteria but is "generic" rather than individualized to the patient.
Exceptional

Plan is appropriate for the diagnosis and accurately addresses the problem identified.<BR>
Plan is economically sound.<BR>
Plan includes plans for evaluation/follow-up care (as appropriate).<BR>
Plan is individualized to the patient's age and development, culture, religion, family, environment, education, and/or any other unique concerns uncovered in assessment.
Evidence-based guidelines utilized

Below Average

Incorrectly or fails to apply evidence-based guidelines to assesment, diagnosis, plan, patient education, or follow-up.
Average

Includes 2 or more errors in the application or omission of evidence-based guidelines to assessment, diagnosis, plan, patient education, or follow-up
Above Average

Includes only one minor error in the application or omission of evidence-based guidelines to assessment, diagnosis, plan, patient education, or follow-up
Exceptional

Evidence of correct application of evidence-based guidelines without omission to assessment, diagnosis, plan, patient education, or follow-up




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16