- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: 1960s Presidential Debate rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
1960s Presidential Debate 1960s Presidential Debate Policy Team Rubric Code: EXA3W5C By Benmen19 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Political Science Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Policy Team
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Writing Assignment	Poor The students writing does not, in any way, provide 1960 policy positions and the grammar and length requirement is not met.	Fair The students writing somewhat provides policy for 1960s but the grammar and length requirement needs improvement.	Good The students writing clearly describes policy for the 1960s and meets both the grammar and length requirements but lacks specifics on topics.	Excellent The students writing is clear and creative. The policy is thought out and reflects the students knowledge of the 1960s climate. The writing contains view points on each topic the Candidate will be asked during the debate.
Presentation	Poor The group's Candidate does not command the space and does not know any policy.	Fair The Candidate commands the space and is charismatic but knows little of the policy questions.	Good The group's Candidate commands the space and is charismatic. They know about the policy but are somewhat off on their specific viewpoints.	Excellent The group's candidate commands the space and is charismatic. They gives details of all aspects of the policy and are in line with their specific viewpoints.
Group Work	Poor The group does not include everyone in their decision making and consistently fights over the project. Some students are not engaged at all in the project.	Fair The group includes everyone in the decision making but some fighting over tone exist. Some students are not engaged in the project.	Good The group includes everyone in the decision making and no one fights over the process. However, some students are not engaged in the project.	Excellent The group includes everyone in the decision making and no one fights over the process. All students are engaged and properly working on the project.