Skip to main content
iRubric: Philosophy of Financial Stewardship Paper rubric

iRubric: Philosophy of Financial Stewardship Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Philosophy of Financial Stewardship Paper 
Written Assignment - Rubric
This Rubric will be used as the criteria for grading the Philosophy of Financial Stewardship Paper
Rubric Code: EX98WB6
By tashlynb
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Finance  
Type: Reflection  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Beginning

(N/A)

Developing

(N/A)

Accomplished

(N/A)

Exemplary

(N/A)

Introduction including Focus/thesis
10 pts

Introduction that includes an overview as to what your paper will cover.
Beginning

The student lacks an introduction completely.

0 pts
Developing

Introduction is vague and poorly demonstrates a focus/thesis statement. The introduction does not align with the title or body of the paper.

1-4 pts
Accomplished

Introduction is clear and conveys a personal philosophy of financial stewardship, however, it is unclear as to whether it fully aligns with the body of the paper.

5-8 pts
Exemplary

Well constructed introduction that presents a clear focus statement and conveys a personal philosophy of financial stewardship. The introduction is strongly aligned with the title and body of the paper.

9-10 pts
Content/subject knowledge
40 pts

Christian Worldview prevention along with contrasting views. Following topics must be included: philosophy of Saving, Debt, Insurance and Risk, Retirement Planning, Giving. Content flows well and is easy to understand.
Beginning

Student includes less than 3 required topics and does not demonstrate a clear understanding of the subject matter. Minimal or no linkages between course content and practical examples or applications. Paper is not outlined in a logical sequence and is presented without a clear purpose or connection.

0-10 pts
Developing

Student includes limited content of worldview, contrast views, own philosophy and only includes 3-4 required topics and exhibits proficient knowledge in relation to the subject matter. Student demonstrates a general understanding of the subject matter. Minimal linkages between course content and practical examples or applications. Sequence of paper is somewhat difficult to follow.

11-25 pts
Accomplished

Student includes worldview, contrast views, own philosophy and includes all 5 required topics and exhibits proficient knowledge in relation to the subject matter. Student is able to relate most course content to practical examples and applications. Paper is laid out in logical sequence, with few exceptions. Paper transitions help guide reader from start to end.

26-35 pts
Exemplary

Student includes worldview, contrast views, own philosophy and includes all 5 required topics and exhibits proficient knowledge in relation to the subject matter. Student demonstrates ability to relate course content to practical examples and applications. Paper is laid out in logical sequence, is clear to understand, and is easy to follow. Body of paper clearly supoprts Introduction.

36-40 pts
Conclusion
10 pts

Conclusion should flow from the body of the paper and be consistent with the Focus/Thesis.
Beginning

Student does not include a conclusion section at end of paper.

0 pts.
Developing

Conclusion is written but is inconsistent with the Focus/Thesis and the body of paper.

1-6 pts.
Accomplished

Conclusion is logical but does not flow from the body of the paper.

7-8 pts.
Exemplary

Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper. Conclusion is consistent with Focus/Thesis of paper.

9-10 pts
References
15 pts

Minimum of 4 Biblical references that support beliefs in philosophy and a minimum of 4 other references from legitamate personal finance sources
Beginning

Less than 4 references are cited or references are not consistent with requirements and do not supoprt beliefs in philosophy.

0-6 pts.
Developing

4- 5 total references are cited. There is a correclation between references cited and beliefs in philosophy of financial stewardship. References are cited with minimal errors.

7-9 pts.
Accomplished

All required references are presented in paper, including 4 Biblical references and 4 other references from personal finance sources. It is unclear if Biblical references support beliefs in philosophy of financial stewardship. References are cited with minimal errors.

10-12 pts.
Exemplary

All required references are presented in paper, including 4 Biblical references and 4 other references from personal finance sources. Biblical references strongly support beliefs in philosophy of financial stewardship. References are cited correctly.

13-15 pts
Completeness
15 pts

Length of paper
Beginning

Less than 3 pages and/or no Cover/Title page

0-4 pts.
Developing

3-4 pages.
Includes Cover/Title page.

5-9 pts.
Accomplished

4-5 pages. 5th page not more than 75% complete.
Includes Cover/Title page.

10-12 pts.
Exemplary

5 full pages or more. No more than 8 pages total.
Includes Cover/Title page.

13-15 pts
Mechanics
10 pts

Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
Beginning

Numerous spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors.
Paper is not formatted correctly based off of requirements given.

0-4 pts.
Developing

More than 3 errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation.
Lacks qualities of MLA formatting.

5-6 pts.
Accomplished

2 or fewer errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation.
MLA format, including double spaced, 1" margins, and 12 font

7-8 pts.
Exemplary

No spelling, grammar, or punctuation error.
MLA format, including double spaced, 1" margins, and 12 font

9-10 pts



Keywords:
  • Undergrad Personal Finance Rubric



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16