iRubric: Ryokan - MACP Dyads rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Ryokan - MACP Dyads

PLO 2 Apply the psychological theories and develop clinical and cultural competence in supervision and assessment and treatment of individuals, couples, families, populations with special needs, and communities in an interdisciplinary setting. ILO 1 (Critical Thinking) ILO 5 (Oral Communication) ILO 7 (Cultural Diversity)

Rubric Code: E25X7X3

By astamos

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Psychology

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Dyad Enter rubric description
	Exceptional 4 pts	Meets Expectations 3 pts	Needs Improvement 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Legal and Ethical Issues Informed consent presented throughly	Exceptional Limitations of and exceptions to confidentiality.(1) Qualifications and background of therapist. (2) Client's and therapist's rights and responsibilities. Ethical boundaries. (3) Definition of Client-Therapist relationship. Complete paperwork. (4) Assesses client's understanding and responds to questions.	Meets Expectations Limitations of and exceptions to confidentiality.(1) Qualifications and background of therapist. (2) Client's and therapist's rights and responsibilities. Ethical boundaries. (3) Definition of Client-Therapist relationship. Complete paperwork. (4). Answers client's questions.	Needs Improvement Limitations of and exceptions to confidentiality.(1) Complete's Paperwork Doesn't ask client questions	Poor Gives paperwork on informed consent, fails to clarify roles.
Knowledge of theories Knowledge of general theoretical concepts is reflected on the interventions.	Exceptional Manifest knowlege of theory by: -Approaching client according to theory's view of client-therapist relationship. -Handles main concepts of change. -Uses techiques derived from the theory (borrows limited techniques from other theories)	Meets Expectations Application of accurate concepts and processes but from a different theory.	Needs Improvement Excessive mixture of concepts from various theories.	Poor Dialogue reflects confusion about basic concepts of theory.
Rapport and professional presence. Therapist builds good rapport and has a sense of security.	Exceptional Creates the conditions for counseling in accord with theoretical premisses.Self-assurance. Elicits interaction and opennes with client. Awareness of posible bias or cultural issues. Respect for client.	Meets Expectations Establish insecurity for the client to disclose further and to get in depth discussion. Unstable rapport with client. Inconsistent interactions with client.	Needs Improvement Mumbling, stuttering, hesitation, insecurity, overt nervousness. Inappropriate approach to client, creating barriers or resistance. Inappropriate comments, overstepping boundaries	Poor Gives advice, interrupts the client, tells the client what to do. Admonishes the client for behavior
Problems Identification Counsellor is able to identify client's problem statements and real issues.	Exceptional Counsellor successfully identified client's real issue and was able to focus on the issue.	Meets Expectations Counsellor was able to identify the real issue of client.	Needs Improvement Counsellor was not so sure about the problem statements and real issue of client.	Poor Does not identify the problem, minimizes client's problem.
Skills and Techniques Counsellor uses appropriate skills and techniques for the right time.	Exceptional Used of basic counselling skills and applied techniques consistently and accurately.	Meets Expectations Used of basic counselling skills, but lacked of techniques and consistency to deal with client's problem.	Needs Improvement Difficulty in applying skills and techniques used in dealing with client as evidenced by confusion and poor directions. Fails to assess if the client understands the basic material.	Poor Does not use techniques and limited skills.

Keywords:

counselingILO 1 (Critical Thinking) ILO 5 (Oral Communication) ILO 7 (Cultural Diversity)

Subjects:

Psychology

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric