Skip to main content
iRubric: Discussion Section Rubric

iRubric: Discussion Section Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Discussion Section Rubric 
Rubric Code: E239A6X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Discussion Section
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Interpretation

Excellent

Section clearly makes connections to sources discussed in the Literature Review that may prove or disprove the claim.
Good

Section makes connections to sources discussed in the Literature Review that may prove or disprove the claim fairly well. Some more analysis could be provided.
Fair

Section attempts to make connections to sources discussed in the Literature Review that may prove or disprove the claim. More analysis needed.
Poor

Lacks a proper interpretation of the sources from the Literature Review. Analysis presented does not support the thesis or problem statement.
Theoretical Implications

Excellent

Theoretical and practical implications are clearly and fully discussed with a strong
connection to the research question.
Good

Theoretical and practical implications are clearly discussed and connected to the research question.
Fair

Theoretical and practical implications are
partially discussed and somewhat connected to the research question.
Poor

Theoretical and practical implications are
inappropriately discussed and not connected to the research question.
Limitations/Future Studies

Excellent

Limitations and future directions clearly and fully follow from results and strongly support the research question.
Good

Limitations and future directions clearly follow from results and support the research question.
Fair

Limitations and future directions partially
follow from results and are vaguely connected to the research question.
Poor

Limitations and future directions are not
discussed.
Sources

Excellent

At least 5 reputable sources included.
Good

Missing 1 source from bibliography. Some sources may lack credibility.
Fair

Less than 3 sources included. Sources may lack credibility or relevance.
Poor

Sources not included to support the section.
Formatting

Excellent

Well-formulated discussion section supported with strong sources of evidence specific to the topic. Appropriate utilization of citations with well-listed bibliography is observed. APA format utilized correctly.
Good

Fairly well formulated discussion that has some evidence to support the topic but the evidence is a mixture of strong and weak sources. Acceptable utilization of citations is observed, minor errors when listing the bibliography. Some errors with APA formatting.
Fair

Sources support some claims made in the paper, but might not be integrated well within the paper’s argument. There may be a few errors in APA style.
Poor

Discussion is not well constructed and provides a few sources of weak evidence to support the topic. No or minimal utilization of citations is observed, frequent errors when listing the bibliography or missing bibliography section as a whole. More than 3 errors in APA formatting.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98