Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Compare/Contrast Essay Literature rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Compare/Contrast Essay Literature
Compare/Contrast Essay Literature
Compare and Contrast two short stories using literary devices/author decisions as point of C/C
Rubric Code:
E233CBC
By
flapperclappet
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Compare/Contrast Essay
4
(N/A)
4
(N/A)
2
(N/A)
1
(N/A)
Thesis Statement
4
Thesis statement is well-developed and provides points suggesting organization for the essay. Reasonable, measurable, provable content. Additionally, there are clear, developed topic sentences at the beginning of each body paragraph in the order as presented in the thesis.
4
Thesis statement is developed and provides some organization. Reasonable, measurable and provable. Additionally, there are topic sentences at the beginning of each body paragraph, but they need some improvement.
2
Thesis statement is attempted, but isn't reasonable, measurable or provable. Additionally, there are topic sentences at the beginning of each body paragraph, but they do not provide a clear focus. Substantial revision needed.
1
Thesis statement is missing, misplaced, or does not directly address the assignment. Topic sentences are not in line with the overall focus of the essay. Additionally, language and presentation of material is unfocused.
Ideas/Development
4
There are (2) two clear comparison/contrast examples between Story A and Story B. Discussion of literary devices is in-depth. Analysis delves into symbolic significance
4
There are (2) two developed comparison/contrast examples between Story A and Story B. Discussion of literary devices is adequate. Analysis is acceptable, but could be taken further
2
There is (1) one developed comparison/contrast example between Story A and Story B. Discussion of literary devices needs some revision. Weak brief analysis
1
Student has not provided any developed comparison examples between the two stories. Mostly plot summary
Organization/Paragraph Structure
4
Overall essay is organized with a clear intro, body paragraphs (2-3), and a conclusion. Each paragraph has a blended structure with a claim, examples, analysis and a concluding thought. Additionally, transitions are used to increase readability.
4
Overall essay is organized with a clear intro, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Each paragraph has blended structure with a claim,examples,
explanations and concluding thought
2
The writing lacks a clear sense of direction. Ideas, details, or events seem strung together in a loose or random fashion; Block structure or no identifiable internal structure.
1
Brief incomplete paragraphs focused on summary. No structure.
Comparisons are superficial
Sentence Fluency
4
Sentences are of an appropriate length, make sense, and are free of subject/verb disagreements. Essay is free of homonym mistakes. Proofreading is evident and meticulous
4
Sentences are of an appropriate length, mostly make sense, but there are some subject/verb disagreements. Essay is free of homonym mistakes. Proofreading is evident
2
Essay contains many errors which are distracting to the reader. Some basic subject/ verb and homonym mistakes, but basic proofreading is lacking
1
Essay is unreadable due to too many errors. Confusing verb tenses.
Many homonym mistakes and a lack of proofreading
Voice
4
The writer speaks directly to the reader in a way that is individual, compelling, and engaging. The writer crafts the writing with an awareness and respect for the audience and the purpose for writing.
4
The writer seems sincere but not fully engaged or involved. The result is pleasant or even personable, but not compelling.
2
The writer seems indifferent, uninvolved, or distanced from the topic and/or the audience.
1
Lacks a sense of ownership over the details
Word Choice
4
Words convey the intended message in a precise, interesting, and natural way. The words are powerful and engaging. Verb tense is consistenly present tense. 3rd person pov
4
The language is functional, even if it lacks much energy. It is easy to figure out the writer's meaning on a general level. Verb tense is consistent, but might not be present tense. 3rd person pov
2
The writer struggles with a limited vocabulary, searching for words to convey meaning. Wordy and confusing. Verb tense shifts and slips into 1st person
pov
1
Slang or inappropriate language choice. Casual and overly familiar. No attention to verb tense or pov
Conventions
4
The writer demonstrates a good grasp of standard writing conventions (e.g., spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar, usage, paragraphing) and uses conventions effectively to enhance readability. Errors tend to be so few that just minor touchups would get this piece ready to publish.
4
The writer shows reasonable control over a limited range of standard writing conventions. Conventions are sometimes handled well and enhance readability; at other times, errors are distracting and impair readability.
2
Errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, usage, and grammar and/or paragraphing repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read.
1
Many mistakes confuses reader and creates ambiguity
Presentation/MLA Typed
4
The essay is typed in MLA style: printed and typed, Times New Roman font, 12 point font size, double spaced including the heading, heading typed on the top left of page one, and there is an original clever title.
4
The essay lacks 1-2 aspects of MLA style and it is double spaced. Original title.
2
The essay lacks 3 aspects of MLA style and it is double spaced. Basic ineffective title.
1
The essay is NOT typed or lacks 3 or more aspects of MLA style or is too brief. No title.
Keywords:
Compare/Contrast Essay, Writing, Essays, English,
Subjects:
Communication
Computers
English
Journalism
Test Preparation
(General)
Types:
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
ePortfolio
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.