Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Physics Toy Design rubric

iRubric: Physics Toy Design rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Physics Toy Design Physics Toy Design You are a toy designer for Toys We 'R promoting a new toy in an engaging ad campaign pitch for the company's executives. You must include a Power Point. Rubric Code: E2263B7 By jgrantcg Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Physics Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

The Next Great Toy
	Nope 0 pts	Poor The design hasn't really convinced the board. They suggest you do more work and come back to them. 1 pts	Acceptable You have designed an attractive project, but some of the board members have serious questions about some aspects of the choices and its profitability. 2 pts	Good You have designed an attractive project, but some of the board members have questions about some aspects of the choices or profitability. 3 pts	Excellent You have designed an extremely attractive project. The board accepts your proposal since all of their concerns have been addressed. 4 pts
The Pitch
PowerPoint Look/quality and organization of the powerpoint	Nope No PowerPoint	Poor The PowerPoint is incomplete. 3 slides or fewer. Or no advertisement.	Acceptable The presentation is somewhat complete. Has 4-6 slides OR no advertisement	Good The presentation is complete. Includes all the necessary elements.	Excellent The presentation is outstanding. The pictures/artwork provided reflect a great effort from the student(s).
Campaign The Pitch	Nope No Pitch	Poor No argument given for why this toy would sell/make money.	Acceptable The content includes a somewhat weak argument for why this toy would be better than any currently available products and for why this toy would make money.	Good The content includes a good argument for why this toy would be better than any currently available products. A good argument is given for why this toy would make money.	Excellent The content includes great arguments for why this toy would be better than any currently available products and make money for the company.
The Team Member	Nope Did not participate	Poor Not well prepared. Speaks very little. May not speak clearly. Not professional.	Acceptable Somewhat prepared OR could speak more clearly OR could be more professional.	Good Could be more engaging, or prepared. Makes eye contact and speaks loudly and clearly enough to be heard. Appears professional.	Excellent Engaging, well prepared. Makes eye contact and speaks loudly and clearly enough to be heard. Appears professional.
The Toy Prototype
Originality/Creativity	Nope No prototype	Poor Prototype shows little thought or effort. Design is not original.	Acceptable Prototype shows some thought and effort. Design is not original, but attempts were made to make it their own.	Good Prototype shows thought and effort. Design has been sufficiently modified to make it original.	Excellent Prototype shows great thought and effort. Was likely redesigned to make improvements. Design is original or has been sufficiently modified to make it original.
Physics "Must contain a movement, function or process."	Nope No prototype	Poor Prototype lacks a movement, function or process.	Acceptable Appears to have created a toy, and made some vague physics connections.	Good The prototype appears to have been created with the physics in mind. Only one physics concept used to explain it.	Excellent The prototype is a good representation of a "physics toy." May have more than one concept used.
Meets Other Criteria	Nope No prototype * Not a weapon * Made from readily available parts * Performs one movement, function or process * Costs under $10	Poor Meets 1 of 4 criteria	Acceptable Meets 2 of 4 criteria	Good Meets 3 of 4 criteria	Excellent Meets 4 of 4 criteria
Report
Accuracy Grammar and vocabulary accuracy in the project.	Nope No report	Poor There are several grammatical errors in the project, making it difficult to understand.	Acceptable A few grammar errors. Project is still somewhat clear and understandable.	Good Little or no grammar errors. The writing is correct and easily understood.	Excellent No problems with grammar and vocabulary accuracy in the project.
Content Photo, idea, physics, list of supplies	Nope No report	Poor Includes 1 of 4 parts	Acceptable Includes 2 of 4 parts	Good Includes 3 of 4 parts	Excellent Includes all 4 parts
Physics feature(s)	Nope No report	Poor Poorly addressed	Acceptable Somewhat addressed: no physics terms	Good Appropriately explained with physics terms	Excellent Very well explained with physics terms

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Foreign Languages rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98