Skip to main content
iRubric: GCU STEM Impact Grant Shark Tank Project Proposal Rubric

iRubric: GCU STEM Impact Grant Shark Tank Project Proposal Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
GCU STEM Impact Grant Shark Tank Project Proposal Rubric 
Project Proposal or Planning Rubric
Project Title
Rubric Code: DXBWW84
By MarniLandry
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Shark Tank Project Proposal Rubric
  Missing or Significantly Incomplete

1 pts

Needs Considerable Work

2 pts

Approaching

3 pts

Target

4 pts

Problem

Missing or Significantly Incomplete

Problem is not identified.

No research is presented in regard to the problem.

Problem does not address community need
Needs Considerable Work

Problem is unclear or ambiguous.

Little evidence of research or stakeholder evidence

Community need is vaguely alluded to
Approaching

Problem is stated.

Some evidence of research and stakeholder interaction

Community need may be stated
Target

Problem is clearly stated and targeted.

Evidence of problem is fully based on research and stakeholder interaction

Community need and impact is clear and evident
Solution

Missing or Significantly Incomplete

The project proposed is not creative, original or ambitious.

Solution is unclear or not present, no evidence of community benefit
Needs Considerable Work

The project proposed is somewhat creative, original or ambitious.

Students present a very general solution that provides a low level of feasibility and states benefits to the community without evidence

Community collaboration is not evident
Approaching

The project proposed is original, creative and somewhat ambitious.

Students provide a general solution and the benefits to the community are described but are not clearly measurable

Community collaboration is mentioned but not actionable
Target

The project proposed is very original, creative and ambitious.

Students provide a detailed, clear solution and describe measurable benefits to the community

Community collaboration is detailed and actionable
Budget

Missing or Significantly Incomplete

Students have an incomplete or missing cost analysis.
Needs Considerable Work

Students do not have a full cost analysis for the project.
Approaching

Students provide an explanation of the costs associated with the project.
Target

Students provide a detailed and justified explanation of the costs associated with the project
Student Involvement

Missing or Significantly Incomplete

Students show very little understanding of the subject matter and thoroughly misinterpret the requirements for the project

STEM integration at all stages of project is not evident
Needs Considerable Work

Students show some understanding of the subject matter but confusion is evident in some aspects of the proposal or plan.

Proposal or plan has a low level of STEM integration at some stages of project.
Approaching

Students show an understanding of the subject matter and it is evident in the execution of the proposal or plan.

Proposal or plan shows some integration of STEM at all stages of project.
Target

Students show a deep understanding of the subject matter and its greater implications.

Proposal or plan shows integration of STEM at all stages of project.
Timeline and scalability

Missing or Significantly Incomplete

No additional deadlines are set

The problem is far too broad to solve within the project constraints

No thought evident for future implementation or scale-ability
Needs Considerable Work

Some broad deadlines are set

The problem is somewhat too large or too small for the team to manage within the timeline and constraints.

Solution design states that it is scale-able without detail
Approaching

Hard and soft deadlines are set

The problem may be manageable for the team within the timeline and constraints with GREAT effort

Solution design may discuss scaling up and sustainability with minimal detail
Target

Realistic hard and soft deadlines are set

The problem is manageable for the team within the timeline and constraints.

Solution design takes into account scalability and sustainability
Mentoring/Professional Development

Missing or Significantly Incomplete

No mention of how participation in Canyon PD and GCU student project plan mentoring will help make the project a reality

No identification of their learning and support needs
Needs Considerable Work

Mention of how participation in Canyon PD and GCU student project plan mentoring will help make the project a reality

No identification of their learning and support needs
Approaching

Mention of how participation in Canyon PD and GCU student project plan mentoring will help make the project a reality

Basic identification of their learning and support needs
Target

Clear description of how participation in Canyon PD and GCU student project plan mentoring will help make the project a reality

Evidence of discussion and thought in regards to identifying their learning and support needs



Keywords:
  • choice-based, proposal


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98