Skip to main content
iRubric: Developmental Autobiography rubric

iRubric: Developmental Autobiography rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Developmental Autobiography 
Personal Philosophy of Leadership
Write a 5-6-page paper discussing your cognitive-structural and psycho-social development during your undergraduate period to the present. Reflect on your development using two of the student development theories covered in this class. Be very specific in stating which theories you are using and fit your experiences into the theory (using its language, concepts, etc.).
Rubric Code: DXB987C
By pdelmas
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Developmental Autobiography
Write a 5-6-page paper discussing your cognitive-structural and psycho-social development during your undergraduate period to the present. Reflect on your development using two of the student development theories covered in this class. Be very specific in stating which theories you are using and fit your experiences into the theory (using its language, concepts, etc.).
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Discussion of Development

Student discussion of cognitive-structural and psycho-social development during undergraduate period to the present.
Excellent

Well-formulated discussion of student's cognitive-structural development AND psycho-social development from undergrad period to present. Numerous examples/specific evidence given.
Good

Clearly formulated discussion of student's cognitive-structural development AND psycho-social development from undergrad period to present. Some examples/evidence given.
Fair

Fairly formulated discussion of student's cognitive-structural development AND psycho-social development from undergrad period to present. Scant examples/evidence given.
Poor

Poorly formulated discussion of student's cognitive-structural development AND psycho-social development from undergrad period to present. No examples/evidence given.
Reflection on Theories

Student reflection on own development using 2 theories covered in class.
Excellent

Well-stated reflection on student's development using 2 theories covered in class. Reflections are richly descriptive using language and concepts appropriate to the theories.
Good

Clearly stated reflection on student's development using 2 theories covered in class. Reflections use language and concepts appropriate to the theories.
Fair

Fairly stated reflection on student's development using 2 theories covered in class. Reflections do not use language and concepts appropriate to the theories.
Poor

Poorly stated reflection on student's development. No theories covered in class are used or only 1 theory is used. Reflections do not use language and concepts appropriate to the theory or use language and concepts not appropriate to the theory.
Format

Double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font.
Follow APA style, including references page.
Excellent

All APA guidelines and paper formatting requirements are followed.
Good

Most APA guidelines and paper formatting requirements are followed.
Fair

Some APA guidelines and paper formatting requirements are followed.
Poor

Few APA guidelines and paper formatting requirements are followed.
Writing

Easily understandable writing.
Free of typos, and grammar and spelling errors.
Evidence of use of Writing Center services.
Excellent

Student received documented assistance from USA Writing Center in crafting assignment. Writing is easy to read. No typos, grammar, or spelling errors.
Good

Student received documented assistance from USA Writing Center in crafting assignment. Writing is readable. Few typos, grammar, or spelling errors.
Fair

Student received documented assistance from USA Writing Center in crafting assignment. Writing is occasionally difficult to read. Frequent typos, grammar, or spelling errors.
Poor

No documentation that student received assistance from USA Writing Center in crafting assignment. Writing is difficult to read. Numerous typos, grammar, or spelling errors.
Supporting Evidence

Evidence related to the population(s) with which the student has identified.
Excellent

Evidence related to relevant student population(s) is present and effectively supports the student's autobiography.
Good

Evidence related to relevant student population(s) is present and somewhat supports the student's autobiography.
Fair

Evidence related to student population(s) is present but is not relevant and/or does not support the student's autobiography.
Poor

No evidence related to relevant student population(s) is present to support the student's autobiography.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98