Skip to main content
iRubric: Tour Guide for the Day Project rubric

iRubric: Tour Guide for the Day Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Tour Guide for the Day Project 
The purpose of this unit is to facilitate student learning about a tourist attraction nearby the campus. The student will create a project to present their chosen site . The student will use technology to conduct internet research in order to be able to present facts about the site's resources, culture, recreational pastimes, and history etc. After the student has gathered all of the research, they will synthesize the information and develop a presentation about the site.
Rubric Code: DXACA4B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Being a tour guide project
  Exceeds Standards

Excellent work is defined as following all of the criterion and doing the best work you can do.

4 pts

Meets Standards

Good work is defined as following most of the directions and doing the best you can do.

3 pts

Progressing Towards Standards

Fair work is defined as making an effort, but not really doing your best work. You are capable of doing much better.

2 pts

Does Not Meet Standards

Poor work is defined as not doing a good job and no real effort was put forth.

1 pts

Power Pt, Poster Board, Borchure
20 pts

Exceeds Standards

Well organized, big words, easy to read. Included at least 10 slides. Creative images. Title page. Ended with resource page.
Meets Standards

Well organized words not very easy to read. Did not include 10 slides. At least five images. Title page, ended with resource page.
Progressing Towards Standards

Not well organized. Could barely read words if at all. Did not include at least five slides. Less than five images. Did not include adequate title page/resource page.
Does Not Meet Standards

Unorganized and unreadabel to audiance. Included less than five slides. No images or under two. Unacceptable title/resource page or any.
Content
20 pts

Exceeds Standards

Content was based on sound research and gave at least twenty facts about the site. Gave an outstanding history of the site.
Meets Standards

Content was based on fact and research. Gave at least fifteen facts about the site. Covered the history of the site.
Progressing Towards Standards

Content showed inadequate research. Gave less than ten facts about the site. History was vague and inadequate.
Does Not Meet Standards

Content showed zero effort in research. Less than five facts about the park. History of the site was unacceptable if any was included.
Geographic Features
20 pts

Exceeds Standards

Gave examples of at least 20-25 natural features, natural resources, and interesting facts, at the site and discussed them throughly.
Meets Standards

Gave examples of at least 15-19 natural features, natural resources, and interesting facts at the site and discussed them throughly.
Progressing Towards Standards

Gave examples of at least 10-14 natural features, natural resources, and interesting facts, at the site and discussed them.
Does Not Meet Standards

Gave examples of 9 or less natural features, natural resources, and interesting facts, at the site and discussed them throughly.
Role Play
20 pts

Exceeds Standards

Did an outstanding job in playing the role of a tour guide. Showed excitement and enthusiam about his or her job. Presented as if it was a real world experience.
Meets Standards

Did an acceptable job playing the role of a archaeologist. Showed enthusiam about his or her job. Did fair presenting as if it was a real world experience.
Progressing Towards Standards

Did and inadequate job playing the role of the archaeologist. Showed very little enthusiam about his or her job. Did not present as if it was a real world experience.
Does Not Meet Standards

Did not play the role as a archaeologist. Showed zero enthusiam about the job. Did not present as if it was a real world experience.
Presentation
20 pts

Sources and Notecards

Exceeds Standards

Student presents with a clear and confident voice, with few mistakes due to repeated practice. Student uses a minimum of 5 reliable sources. Student reads majority from prepared notecards for memorization
Meets Standards

Student presents with a clear voice, that has a few mistakes due to some practice. Student uses a minimum of 4 reliable sources. Student reads majority from prepared notecards for memorization
Progressing Towards Standards

Student presents with a faltering voice, with many mistakes due to little practice. Student uses a minimum of 2-3 reliable sources. Student reads majority from prepared notecards for memorization
Does Not Meet Standards

Student presents with a faltering voice and many mistakes due to no practice Student uses 1 resource. Reads directly from presentation.



Keywords:
  • social studies, geography, projects, humanities, technology


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98