Skip to main content
iRubric: Microteaching Performance Assessment rubric

iRubric: Microteaching Performance Assessment rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Microteaching Performance Assessment 
Rubric Code: D33AX3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Test Preparation  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Microteaching
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor or Missing

1 pts

Lesson Aim

Excellent

The lesson is based on a clear aim. The aim is complete and well written
Good

The lesson is based on an aim. The aim is not clear enough, but it is well written
Fair

The lesson is based on an aim. The aim is not clear enough, and it is not well written
Poor or Missing

The lesson is not based on an aim.
Content of Lesson

Excellent

Content of lesson is grade level appropriate (14-18 year old students), meets the objective, and is engaging for students
Good

One of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson is grade level appropriate(14-18 year old students), meets the objective, and is engaging for students
Fair

Two of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson is grade level appropriate(14-18 year old students), meets the objective, and is engaging for students
Poor or Missing

Three of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson is grade level appropriate(14-18 year old students), meets the objective, and is engaging for students
Instructional Components of Lesson

Excellent

Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and Independent Practice are included and effective. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson
Good

One of the following are missing and/or ineffective: Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and Independent Practice. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson
Fair

Two or more of the following are missing and/or ineffective: Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and Independent Practice. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson
Poor or Missing

Several of the following areas are either missing and/or ineffective. Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and Independent Practice are included. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson
Pattern in the reading task

Excellent

The activities in the reading lesson follow this pattern:

1.Introductory activity: introduction to the topic of the text (Before you read) or/and activity focusing on the language of the text)
2.Main activities: comprehension activities developing different reading subskills.
3. Post activities which ask learners to talk about how the reading topic relates to their own lives or gives opinions on parts of the text.
Good

The activities in the reading lesson follow this pattern but without respecting a logical order:

1.Introductory activity: introduction to the topic of the text (Before you read) or/and activity focusing on the language of the text)
2.Main activities: comprehension activities developing different reading subskills.
3. Post activities which ask learners to talk about how the reading topic relates to their own lives or gives opinions on parts of the text.
Fair

The activities in the reading lesson follow only two elements of this pattern :

1.Introductory activity: introduction to the topic of the text (Before you read) or/and activity focusing on the language of the text)
2.Main activities: comprehension activities developing different reading subskills.
3. Post activities which ask learners to talk about how the reading topic relates to their own lives or gives opinions on parts of the text.
Poor or Missing

The activities in the reading lesson follow only one element of this pattern :

1.Introductory activity: introduction to the topic of the text (Before you read) or/and activity focusing on the language of the text)
2.Main activities: comprehension activities developing different reading subskills.
3. Post activities which ask learners to talk about how the reading topic relates to their own lives or gives opinions on parts of the text.
Quality of Presentation

Excellent

Quality of voice, professional behavior, organization, respect for the assigned time, interaction with students, and overall presentation are evident.
Good

One to two of the following are deficient: quality of voice, professional behavior, orgaization, respect for the assigned time, interaction with students, and overall presentation
Fair

Three of the following are deficient : quality of voice, professional behavior, respect for the assigned time, interaction with students, and overall presentation
Poor or Missing

Four or more of the following are deficient or unacceptable: quality of voice, professional behavior, respect for the assigned time, interaction with students, and overall presentation
Preparedness

Excellent

The work group is completety prepared, has rehearsed and respect the assigned time.
Good

The work group seem pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals. They respect the assigned time.
Fair

The work group seem pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals. They do not respect the assigned time.
Poor or Missing

The work group does not seem at all prepared to present.
Language Use

Excellent

The speech presents no grammatical mistakes or they are not noticeable.
Good

There are some minor grammatical mistakes along the speech but they do not affect the comprehension of the information.
Fair

There are some important grammatical mistakes which affect the comprehension at trhe level of sentence but not the whole information.
Poor or Missing

The speech can not be followed because of the amount of grammatical mistakes
Pronunciation

Excellent

The student speaks clearly and distinctly all the time. There aren't pronunciation mistakes or they are not noticeable.
Good

The student speaks clearly and distinctly most of the time. Pronunciation mistakes occur rarely and they do not affect the comprehension of the message.
Fair

The student speaks clearly most of the time. A few important pronunciation mistakes occur which affect the meaning of words, expressions or phrase. There are some sounds from the mother tongue.
Poor or Missing

The student often mumbles or can not be understood. Pronunciation is poor and there are a lot of sounds from the mother tongue.



Keywords:
  • lesson plans, micro teaching







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16