Skip to main content
iRubric: Leadership Development Plan rubric

iRubric: Leadership Development Plan rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Leadership Development Plan 
Rubric Code: D2W899C
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Leadership Development Plan
  Below average

12 pts

Average

16 pts

Above average

18 pts

Superior

20 pts

Introduction/conclusion

Below average

No thesis statement. Purpose of paper not explained.
Average

Student sets up thesis and goals in introduction. Student refers back to thesis statement.
Above average

Student sets up thesis and goals in introduction. Somewhat explains purpose of paper. Student refers back to thesis statement.
Superior

Student sets up thesis and goals in introduction. Clearly explains purpose of paper. Student refers back to thesis statement and makes strong final statement.
Content

Below average

--Responses unclear or non-existent.
--Or, support for case study insufficient.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and/or conclusion non-existent.
Average

--Responses too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or poor for case study.
--Support for responses barely sufficient, and/or.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Above average

--Responses somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and/or questionable for case study.
--Support for responses sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Superior

--Responses interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of paper and appropriate for case study.
--Support for responses complex, complete, and in-depth.
--Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Comprehension

Below average

--did not apply learned knowledge to case
--did not make connections between cases and law
Average

--minimally applied knowledge to case
--made some connections between cases and law
Above average

--above average application of knowledge to case
--made good connections between cases and law
Superior

--superior application of knowledge to case
--superior connections between cases and law
Grammar and Style

Below average

-- Voice inconsistent and/or inappropriate.
-- Ineffective word choice.
--Spelling errors.
--More than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Average

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Fewer than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Above average

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Superior

--Consistent and appropriate voice, use of third person.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Format/research

Below average

--no outside research
--did not follow format
Average

--minimal outside research
--somewhat followed format
Above average

--some outside research
--followed format with one error
Superior

--outside research that added to argument
--followed format
Leadership Concepts 10 Points Each

Below average

Numerous problems with the following:
The leadership concept is clearly defined with academic or research backed information. It includes a clear present personal assessment on the concept and a future goal. A plan for achieving the goal is included.

(6 pts)
Average

Several problems with the following:
The leadership concept is clearly defined with academic or research backed information. It includes a clear present personal assessment on the concept and a future goal. A plan for achieving the goal is included.

(8 pts)
Above average

1-2 problems with the following:
The leadership concept is clearly defined with academic or research backed information. It includes a clear present personal assessment on the concept and a future goal. A plan for achieving the goal is included.

(9 pts)
Superior

The leadership concept is clearly defined with academic or research backed information. It includes a clear present personal assessment on the concept and a future goal. A plan for achieving the goal is included.

(10 pts)



Keywords:
  • Case Study Research







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98