Skip to main content

iRubric: Contemporary Art Project Proposal - Theme: Myth rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Contemporary Art Project Proposal - Theme: Myth 
Contemporary Art Project Proposal - Theme: Myth
Propose art project with theme revolving around the concept of myth in contemporary art. Content of Project Proposal be followed with supporting statement.
Rubric Code: D24BCC7
By lmccausland
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
Non submission of project project is equivalent to 50%.
  BELOW BASIC

65 - 75

(N/A)

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

76 - 81

(N/A)

BASIC

82 - 87

(N/A)

MEETS STANDARD

88 - 94

(N/A)

PROFICIENT

95+

(N/A)

Content & Project Development
50 %

Follow given content with clarity in the inclusion of Introduction, Type of Project, Proposed Space, Exhibition Date/Duration, Project Statement, Project Description, Project Goals/Objectives, Project Timeline, Materials, Sample Artworks with image and supplementary specifications, and Timeline/Projects' Planning Phase
BELOW BASIC

Content is poor and incomplete.

Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.

The Majority of the Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

- Content is incomplete.

- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.

Alot of the Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.

Need to complete required content with clear and specific support statement.
BASIC

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.

- Major points of project are addressed, but not well supported.

- Content and research is inadequate or does not address proposed concept.

- Some of the Content is inconsistent with regard to statement, goals and objective, and clarity of thought.

Lacks some required/necessary content or not enough to support the proposed concept. Improvement is necessary.
MEETS STANDARD

- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points of project are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Content and research are adequate, timely and addresses course concepts.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
-Some contents require fine tuning.
PROFICIENT

Content is complete, thorough, accurate, persuasive and relates to a propose concept.
- Major points are specific, stated clearly, and are well-supported.
- content and research satisfactorily address proposed concept.
-project concept is focused with clear a succinct writing
Concept, Organization & Structure
30 %

Concept is according to contemporary art mode.
Organization and sections follows the
BELOW BASIC

- Organization and structure are insufficient.

Sections /Topics part of the whole project proposal are missing

-most of discussions are disjointed and lack clear and transition of thoughts

-Proposed concept/idea needs revision.

No discussion on theory, local context and findings in contemporary art context.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

- Organization and structure detract from the concepts of the proposal.

- Ideas are disjointed and lack clear and transition of thoughts.

-Lacks some sections/topics of the whole project proposal.

-Proposed concept/idea needs improvement

Lacks discussion on theory, local context and findings in contemporary art context
BASIC

- Structure of the proposal is not easy to follow.

- Sections transitions need improvement.

-some of the concepts/ideas are disconnected.

Some sections/topics are missing or incomplete in discussion.

Proposed concept/idea lacks contemporary art context.

Limited discussion on theory, local context and findings in contemporary art context.
MEETS STANDARD

Concept is filled with enough amount of details to support the proposal.

The proposal is clear with room for improvement but not convincingly workable according to proposed timeline or timeline. It is either incomplete or does not support completely the proposal.

Some relationships with theory, local context and findings in contemporary concept.
PROFICIENT

Concept is filled with necessary details to support the proposal.

Structure of the outline is very clear, easy to follow, interesting and workable according to proposed timeline.

Proposed concept/idea of art project has impressive contemporary mode.

Clear relationship with theory, local context and findings in contemporary art.
Cover Letter
10 %

Follows the business standard and formal language in the letter.
BELOW BASIC

Cover letter is incomplete and/or offers little detail.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Cover letter lacks name and title including address, is inconsistent or inappropriate, and/or is missing goals, purpose/objectives and convincing statements.
BASIC

Cover letter is in formal language but incomplete name and address, with few inconsistencies, and/or briefly describes the goals, and purpose.
MEETS STANDARD

- Cover letter is in formal language; name and address of the official is incomplete; describes goals and has description of the objectives/purpose and concept of the project.
PROFICIENT

Cover letter is in formal language; addressed specifically to the official with designated title and complete address; describes clearly the goals, objective and concept of the proposal.
Oral Presentation
10 %

Preparedness with thorough understanding of the concept proposal.
BELOW BASIC

Poor

Lacks understanding of the content of the project proposal.
Lacks or no discussion of the content of proposal.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Fair

Not really prepared and coping to discuss the content of proposal.
BASIC

Good

Almost prepared but needed to discuss clearly the proposal.
MEETS STANDARD

Very Good

Prepared but lacks clear discussion and content of presentation.
PROFICIENT

Excellent

Fully prepared with excellent material presentation.
SCORE
0 %

Content & Project Development = 50%
Concept, Organization & Structure = 30%
Cover Letter = 10%
Oral Presentation = 10%
TOTAL = 100 %
BELOW BASIC
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
BASIC
MEETS STANDARD
PROFICIENT



Keywords:
  • Rubic, assessment, myth, contemporary art, art project



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n22