- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Needs Assessment Written Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Needs Assessment Written Project Needs Assessment Written Project Rubric Code: D228682 By rodriguezbc Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criterion
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Content & Development Needs Assessment	Excellent Content is comprehensive and clear.	Good Content is accurate.	Fair Content is incomplete, inaccurate, and/or unclear.	Poor Content is plagarized (cut and pasted), copied
Format, Organization & Structure Training Plan - Methods, Trg Schedule is sequential, Agenda, materials listed,	Excellent Summary is organized, clear, and easy to follow.	Good Summary is mostly easy and clear to follow.	Fair Organization and structure are confusing. Plan is too long or too short (instructions not followed).	Poor Format does not meet minimum expectations of a college writing. Organization and structure are unacceptable.
Sells Program Benefits of Trg (ROI) Costs Summarized Target Audience Defined	Excellent All points are covered and accurate	Good Most of points are covered and accurate	Fair Some of the points are covered.	Poor Key points (eg ROI)are not included.
Grammar	Excellent Structure of paper is easy to follow; paragraphs well-built and transitions are clear. Sentences are clear and writing is at an advanced level.	Good Paper contains very few errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling. Length is very near expected with standard margins and font.	Fair Paper contains several errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling. Length is somewhat less than expected.	Poor Paper contains far more errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling than is acceptable. Length is far less than expected.
Performance Objectives Evaluated	Excellent Evaluation is well designed and assesses the plan's defined performance objectives.	Good Evaluation assesses a majority of the plan's defined performance objectives	Fair Evaluation is not well designed and misses a majority of the performance objectives.	Poor Evaluation is not effective.