iRubric: Critical Appraisal of Evidence for Practice rubric

-Shows evidence of data gathering within the student's practice regarding a clinical issue.
-Incorporates PICOT to formulate/frame an answerable question.
-Systematic search of the evidence with at least 5 research studies discussing evidence based practice of the clinical issue

-Shows evidence of data gathering within the student's practice regarding a clinical issue.
-Partially incorporates PICOT to formulate/frame an answerable question.
-Systematic search of the evidence with 3-5 research studies discussing evidence based practice of the clinical issue

-Shows evidence of data gathering within the student's practice regarding a clinical issue.
-PICOT not used to formulate/frame an answerable question.
-Systematic search of the evidence with <3 research studies discussing evidence based practice of the clinical issue

Incorporates zero ideas that enrich and develop the theme.

Makes no connection between data gathered and the PICOT question

-The General Appraisal Overview for All Studies (GAO) used to determine if the literature will be a "keeper" study (Fineout-Overholt, 2019).
-All valid, reliable, and applicable studies on the clinical issue are identified by using a design specific checklist from your Melnyk (2019) textbook to critically appraise the literature.

-The General Appraisal Overview for All Studies (GAO) is partially used to determine if the literature will be a "keeper" study (Fineout-Overholt, 2019)
-All valid, reliable, and applicable studies on the clinical issue are identified by using a design specific checklist from your Melnyk (2019) textbook to critically appraise the literature.

-The General Appraisal Overview for All Studies (GAO) is not used to determine if the literature will be a "keeper" study.
-Only 2-3 studies are valid, reliable, and applicable to the clinical issue as identified by using a design specific checklist from your Melnyk (2019) textbook to critically appraise the literature.

-The General Appraisal Overview for All Studies (GAO) not used
-<2 valid, reliable, and applicable studies on the clinical issue are identified by using a design specific checklist from your Melnyk (2019) textbook to critically appraise the literature.

-Key information is pulled from the evaluation table to produce a "snapshot" of the evidence
-This is placed in a synthesis table (Appendix C, Melnyk, 2019)
-There should be a column labeled "Synthesis" with evidence there is agreement of the evidence across studies

-Minimal errors when Key information is pulled from the evaluation table to produce a "snapshot" of the evidence
-This is placed in a synthesis table (Appendix C, Melnyk, 2019)
-There should be a column labeled "Synthesis" with evidence there is agreement of the evidence across studies

-Moderate errors when Key information is pulled from the evaluation table to produce a "snapshot" of the evidence
-This is placed in a synthesis table (Appendix C, Melnyk, 2019)
-Minimal evidence there is agreement of the evidence across studies

-Excessive errors when Key information is pulled from the evaluation table to produce a "snapshot" of the evidence
-Synthesis table not used

-Uses APA formatting with no grammatical errors

-Has minimal APA formatting and grammatical errors

-Has moderate APA formatting and grammatical errors

-Has excessive APA formatting and grammatical errors