iRubric: Client Interview and Coaching Experience rubric

- Structure of questions is clear and easy to follow.
- Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic, addresses the likely cause(s) of action, their elements and previews major points.
- Topical transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
-Each topic within the paper is addressed thoroughly.

-Structure of the paper is mostly clear and easy to follow.
-The opinion of the writer is rather neutral.
-Introduction provides some background and previews some of the major points.
-Paragraph transitions are mostly present and logical, and mostly maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
-Conclusion is somewhat logical but lacks some strength in that it does not entirely flow from the body of the paper.
-Paragraphs are of proper length.
-Topics are covered tho

- Structure of the questions is not easy to follow.
- Introduction is missing or, if provided, does not preview causes of action and major points.
- Topical transitions need improvement.

-Organization and structure detract from the goal of obtaining all relevant information.
-Introduction is incomplete.
-Topics are somewhat, though not addressed thoroughly.

- Organization and structure make it impossible to ascertain the message of the writer.
- Introduction and/or conclusion is missing.
-Topics are not addressed thoroughly.

- The client's name is left out and HIPPA law is properly practiced.
Client is described in detail. All the information given is included as well as extra information that is needed to understand client's purpose of working with a coach.

- A client description is provided in detail. All the information given in the case study is included.

- A client description is provided. Most of the information given in the case study is included.

- A client description is lacking in detail and unclear.

- There is no client description at all.

- Questions reflect creativity in gathering data to assess the client's coaching experience, mastery of wellness plan and goal achievement.

- Questions (9 out of 10) reflect accurate identification of client's coaching experience, mastery wellness plan, and goal achievement.

- 7 out of 10 questions reflect accurate identification of client's coaching experience, mastery of wellness plan, and goal achievement.

- 5 out 10 questions minimally reflect identification of client's coaching experience, mastery of wellness plan, and goal achievement.

- All of the questions does not accurately assess client's coaching experience, level of mastery in their wellness plan and goal achievement.

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display professional tone and structure.

Paper follows almost all guidelines.
-Paper contains very few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
-Language is mostly clear and includes very little jargon or conversational tone.

- Paper follows most guidelines.
- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.

Paper contains several grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
-Language is unclear, and includes the use of jargon or conversational tone.

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses excessive jargon or conversational tone.