- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Philosophy Paper/Plan Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Philosophy Paper/Plan Rubric Theory Paper Rubric Rubric Code: CXA95W By kelvin_thompson Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Philosophy Paper/Plan Rubric
	Poor 519.2 pts	Fair 607.2 pts	Good 695.2 pts	Excellent 783 pts	Superior 880 pts
Completeness of assignment 22.5 %	Poor More than half of the components not incorporated	Fair Up to half of the components not incorporated	Good Two or more assignment components not incorporated	Excellent 1 assignment component not incorporated	Superior All assignment components incorporated into submission
Thoroughness 22.5 %	Poor Each topic is treated only weakly in the submission	Fair Some topics are treated somewhat weakly in the submission	Good Only some topics are treated somewhat thoroughly in the submission	Excellent Each topic is treated somewhat thoroughly in the submission	Superior Each topic is treated very thoroughly in the submission
Clarity of ideas 22.5 %	Poor Ideas unsupported by details –no evidence of reflection.	Fair Ideas somewhat unsupported by details – little evidence of reflection or insight.	Good Ideas supported by some details - evidence of some reflection or insight.	Excellent Depth of ideas is supported by details - evidence of reflection and insight.	Superior Depth of ideas is supported by rich, engaging, and or pertinent details - evidence of reflection and insight.
Accuracy and/or quality of ideas 22.5 %	Poor Submission contains only unoriginal ideas and/or inaccurate information	Fair Submission contains few original ideas or some accurate information	Good Submission contains at least some original ideas and/or some accurate information	Excellent Entire content of submission contains original ideas and/or accurate information	Superior Entire content of submission contains well-developed original ideas and/or precisely-worded, accurate information
Surface features 10 % (e.g., formatting, correct spelling, grammar, complete sentences, and appropriate citations if necessary.)	Poor Lacks acceptable control of surface features (i.e., numerous distracting flaws in formatting, spelling, grammar, etc.)	Fair Somewhat lax in control of surface features (i.e., formatting, spelling, grammar, typographical errors, etc.) [94.80 point] Very lax in control of surface features (i.e., formatting, spelling, grammar, typographical errors, etc.) [82.80 points]	Good Somewhat lax in control of surface features (i.e., formatting, spelling, grammar, typographical errors, etc.)	Excellent Controls somewhat well for surface features (i.e., formatting, spelling, grammar, typographical errors, etc.) [106.80 poi	Superior Controls very well for surface features (i.e., formatting, spelling, grammar, typographical errors, etc.)