- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Government Poverty Programs rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Government Poverty Programs Rubric Code: CX9W658 By graefsy Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Government Poverty Programs
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Great 4 pts
Content	Poor Content is not accurate or contains more than five factual errors.	Fair The content is somewhat accurate, but are pieces of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate.	Good Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be inaccurate.	Great All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors.
Comparisons	Poor Gives little to no indication of comparisons between both programs. No thought has gone into differences between both programs.	Fair Some information is given about differences between both programs. Lacking detail about certain differences.	Good Information given about comparison is good. Gives details about differences between both programs.	Great Exceeds expectations on comparisons on both programs. Details fully on differences from both programs.
Conclusion	Poor There is no clear-cut conclusion on whether the programs help combat poverty or not	Fair There is some selmblance on a conclusion, but not enough is given	Good There is ample information for a conclusion but not clear on if the programs help combat poverty	Great There is a clear-cut conclusion with ample evidence that the programs helps or does not help combat poverty
Presentation	Poor Did not use the approved list of presentation sites/makers/etc. Could not see/hear the presentation. Was not organized and original.	Fair Used approved lists of presentation sites/makers/etc. Could see/hear the presentation but more work needed. Not original and organization was sloppy. Dull and boring.	Good Used approved lists of presentation sites/makers/etc. Could see/hear the presentation with little effort. Original and organized yet could work on it more. Not as vibrant as it could be. Did some outside media to boost presentation.	Great Used approved list of presentation sites/makers/etc. Could clearly see/hear the presentation. Very original and organized. Utilized outside media such as music, video, etc. to boost presentation.
Citations	Poor No citations is given for any information found.	Fair Little citaiton is found. Has numerous errors.	Good Cites everything but has errors.	Great Cites everything fully and correctly.
Spelling and Grammar	Poor Presentation has more than 5 grammatical and/or spelling errors.	Fair Presentation has 3-4 grammatical errors and misspellings.	Good Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors.	Great Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.