iRubric: Journal Article Review rubric

- Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
-Does not include all expected components of an excellent paper.

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
-Few expected components of an excellent paper are included.

- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Major points are stated.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
-Most expected components of an excellent paper are included.

- Content is comprehensive, accurate, persuasive, and reflects critical thinking and analysis.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
-Contains all expected components: review of literature, methods, results, discussion, suggestions for further study, conclusion.

- Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting.
- Paper is inadequate/excessive in length.
-Paper is not double spaced

- Paper follows most guidelines.
- Paper is over/ under word length.

- Paper follows designated guidelines.
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
-Format is good.

- Paper follows all designated guidelines.
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
-Format enhances readability of paper.