Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: SHS Cornell Notes Grading Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
SHS Cornell Notes Grading Rubric
Cornell Notes Grading Rubric
A rubric for evaluation of note taking using Cornell note taking method.
Rubric Code:
CX9584A
By
KLuise
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criteria
Exceeds
4 pts
Proficient
3 pts
Developing
2 pts
Beginning
1 pts
Deficient
0 pts
Page Layout/Mechanics
Exceeds
All parts are in place (Name, date, topic, class, page number) and followed Cornell format (Heading, Summary, Notes, Review).
Proficient
All but one area out of place (Name, date, topic, class, page number) followed Cornell format (Heading, Summary, Notes, Review).
Developing
Missing two parts (Name, date, topic, class, page number). Did follow Cornell format (Heading, Summary, Notes, Review).
Beginning
Missing three parts (Name, date, topic, class, page number). Did not follow Cornell format (Heading, Summary, Notes, Review).
Deficient
Missing more than three parts (Name, date, topic, class, page number). Did not follow Cornell format (Heading, Summary, Notes, Review).
Legibility
Exceeds
Notes are readable and neat.
Proficient
Readable but could be neater.
Developing
Some part are readable, but some sections are hard to read.
Beginning
Cannot read notes.
Deficient
No notes taken
Notes/Body
Exceeds
Notes are accurate and paraphrased.
Main ideas captured.
Abbreviations are used.
Notes are edited upon ppt/text/video review with underlining of ALL main ideas, question mark next to points of confusion, * next to test question highlights.
Spacing is consistent.
Proficient
Notes are accurate.
Paraphrasing used but not always.
Abbreviations are used.
Revisions are made and additions present upon ppt/text/video review with underlining of MOST main ideas, question mark next to points of confusion, * next to test question highlights.
Spacing used properly.
Developing
Some inaccuracies present.
Some paraphrasing present.
Some abbreviations used.
Few revisions made.
Spacing inconsistent.
Beginning
Notes are not accurate.
No paraphrasing.
No use of abbreviations.
No revisions or edits made.
No spacing present.
Deficient
No notes taken
Key Points/Vocabulary/Questions
Exceeds
Key points and vocabulary clearly present.
Two or more questions present demonstrating critical analysis and understanding and placed in appropriate column.
Questions are answered in notes column. Key terms are circled.
Proficient
Most key points and some vocabulary present.
Two questions present but not critical in analysis or depth of understanding. Some questions answered in notes. Some key terms are circled.
Developing
Some key points or some vocabulary present
only one key question written or did not reflect notes or lesson. Questions not answered in notes. Key terms are not circled.
Beginning
Few key points or vocabulary present
No questions present nor answered. Of vocabulary present, no terms have been circled.
Deficient
No key points or vocabulary present nor circled. No questions present.
Summary
Exceeds
Summary clearly reflects main ideas and makes connection to the main topic as well as to other ideas and concepts AND distinctly answers essential question. Clearly summarizes ppt/text/video.
Proficient
Most of the main ideas are summarized and connect to the topic.
Good connections are made to other ideas or concepts and provides an answer to the essential question. Summarizes, but not clearly the ppt/text/video.
Developing
Summary simply restates notes without connection to main topic, ideas or concepts, moreover the essential question.
Beginning
An attempt of a Summary has been made not aligned with material.
Deficient
No Summary present.
Keywords:
Cornell, Notes
Subjects:
Engineering
Health
Social Sciences
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.