iRubric: Comparing Constitutions Powerpoint rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Comparing Constitutions Powerpoint

Rubric Code: C857A3

By lsaxton

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

Comparing Constitutions
	Unacceptable 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Fulfills Requirements of #1-3	Unacceptable Does not answer questions 1-3	Poor Answers one of questions 1-3	Fair Answers 2 of questions 1-3	Good Answers all of questions 1-3 adequately	Excellent Answers all of questions 1-3 well.
Fulfills requirements on principles	Unacceptable Does not identify examples of the 6 principles and any additional principles, or does not identify them correctly.	Poor Identifies 1-2 correct examples of the 6 principles and/or additional principles, or identifies 3-4 with some incorrect identifications.	Fair Identifies 3-4 correct examples of the 6 principles and/or additional principles, or identifies 5-6 with some incorrect identifications.	Good Identifies 5-6 correct examples of the 6 principles and/or additional principles, or identifies more than 6 with some incorrect identifications.	Excellent Correctly identifies all possible principles.
Fulfills requirement on branches	Unacceptable No attempt	Poor Identifies the branches but does not discuss powers or make an argument as to which is most powerful	Fair Identifies the branches and attempts to discuss powers. May not make an argument as to which is most powerful.	Good Identifies the branches and discusses powers of each. Makes a good argument as to which is most powerful.	Excellent Identifies the branches and discusses in detail powers of each. Makes an excellent argument as to which is most powerful.
fulfills requirements on rights	Unacceptable No attempt	Poor Identifies 3 or fewer rights in the constitution; does not explain whether rights are respected	Fair Identifies 4-5 rights in the constitution; makes an attempt to explain whether rights are respected	Good Identifies 6-7 rights in the constitution; good explanation of whether rights are respected	Excellent Identifies more than 7 rights in the constitution; excellent explanation of whether rights are respected
Fulfills requirements 9-11	Unacceptable No attempt	Poor One of the three questions is answered, or there is an inaccurate attempt to answer the questions	Fair Two of the questions are answered, or there is an uneven attempt to answer some of the questions	Good All three questions are answered accurately	Excellent All three questions are answered accurately and in depth.
Conclusion	Unacceptable No attempt	Poor A poor attempt is made to compare the constitutions	Fair A fair attempt is made to compare the constitutions	Good A good attempt is made to compare the constitutions	Excellent An excellent attempt is made to compare the constitutions
Depth	Unacceptable Power point does not demonstrate research, critical thinking or analysis.	Poor Power point demonstrates little research, critical thinking or analysis.	Fair Power point demonstrates some research, critical thinking and analysis.	Good Power point demonstrates research, critical thinking and analysis; may be uneven or lack depth.	Excellent Power point demonstrates excellent research, critical thinking and analysis.
Presentation	Unacceptable Presentation is incomprehensible. Students read the slides.	Poor Presentation may be mostly inaudible, include mumbling, or be halting. Students merely read the slides.	Fair Students presented the power point in an acceptable manner. May not have been loud enough at times; may simply read the slides.	Good Mostly presented the power point in an engaging manner, with proper volume. Some details added that were not shown on the slides.	Excellent Students presented the power point in an engaging manner, with proper volume. Many details added that were not shown on the slides.
Principles of the Constitution	Unacceptable Power point and presentation do not demonstrate understanding of the principles of the constitution. Many significant inaccuracies.	Poor Power point and presentation demonstrate a poor understanding of the principles of the constitution. Significant inaccuracies.	Fair Power point and presentation demonstrate a fair understanding of the principles of the constitution. Some inaccuracies.	Good Power point and presentation demonstrate a good understanding of the principles of the constitution. Few or no inaccuracies.	Excellent Power point and presentation demonstrate excellent understanding of the principles of the constitution. All details correct.
Appearance	Unacceptable The power point is plain, with no visuals added. Spelling and grammar are unacceptable.	Poor The power point is plain; or few visuals have been added; and/or spelling and grammar are poor.	Fair Somewhat attractive. Visuals may not aid in understanding comparison between constitutions. Fair spelling and grammar.	Good Attractive. Visuals contribute significantly to understanding the comparison between constitutions. Spelling and grammar good.	Excellent Very attractive. Visuals contribute significantly to understanding comparison between constitutions. Excellent spelling, grammar.

Keywords:

comparative government, constitutions, powerpoint

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric