- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Concert Review - Final Exam Alternative Assignment rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Concert Review - Final Exam Alternative Assignment Concert Review Concert Review Rubric Code: C2398AX By themanofstick Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Music Type: Writing Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Concert Review
	Poor 0-10 points (N/A)	Fair 11-16 points (N/A)	Good 17-21 points (N/A)	Excellent 22-25 points (N/A)
Introduction	Poor Introduction does not include mention most of the pieces on the program and does not discuss the performance venue.	Fair Introduction includes some, but not most, of the pieces on the program and very briefly discusses the performance venue with little to no details.	Good Introduction includes information about most or all of the pieces on the program and briefly discusses the performance venue with some details.	Excellent Introduction includes all information about all pieces on the program and discusses the performance venue with great details.
Personal Opinion Content	Poor Musical expression and emotional connection are not mentioned satisfactorily; personal reaction is not described. Does not identify any specific parts in the piece or instruments playing.	Fair Musical expression and emotional connection are mentioned but not fully described; personal reaction to the performance is not a focus.	Good Musical expression and emotional connection are described clearly; personal reactions to the performance exist but are not thoroughly discussed.	Excellent Musical expression and emotional connection described very thoroughly; personal reactions are very detailed.
Factual Content	Poor Factual Content lacking details, if there is any given at all.	Fair Factual Content poorly written about pieces, composer and group performing; contains minimal detail.	Good Factual Content is given about most pieces, composer and group performing; contains some detail.	Excellent Factual Content is given about the piece(s), composer, and group performing; very detailed with citations used.
Spelling/Grammar/Formatting	Poor A lot of spelling and/or grammar errors that detract from the reading and make the critique hard to understand. Paper is not the required length and/or is not typed.	Fair Frequent spelling and/or grammar errors that detract from the reading of the critique. Paper is not required length but is typed.	Good Few spelling and/or grammar errors that only slightly detract from the reading of the critique. Paper is just shy of the required length and is typed.	Excellent Almost no spelling and/or grammar errors; does not detract from the reading of the critique. Paper meets or exceeds required length and is typed.