Skip to main content
iRubric: Business Organizations- Group Presentation rubric

iRubric: Business Organizations- Group Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Business Organizations- Group Presentation 
Legal Writing (IRAC)
Rubric Code: BXC8C89
By Jeatlaw
Ready to use
Private Rubric
Subject: Law  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric IRAC
  Minimal

0.25 pts

Effective

0.5 pts

Outstanding

1 pts

Issue
1 pts

The Issue section identifies the area of law that is relevant to the problem question and clearly describes the legal problem(s) that need to be addressed
Minimal

The area of law is correctly identified but the statement does not clearly describe the legal problem(s) that need to be addressed.
Effective

The area of law and the legal problem(s) to be addressed are identified but the description of the problem(s) are not clear or are incomplete.
Outstanding

The area of law and the legal problem(s) to be addressed are identified and clearly and completely described
Rules
2 pts

The Rules section identifies the relevant legal principles and their source of authority.
Minimal

1.0
Some identification of relevant legal principles but the correct source of authority (Section of Act or relevant case) has not been cited
Effective

1.5
All or most of the relevant legal principles and their correct source of authority has been cited but the explanation of the principles is not clear or is incomplete
Outstanding

2.0
All relevant legal principles are clearly explained and their correct source of authority is given.
Application/Analysis
2 pts

The Application section considers each legal principle identified in the Rules section and explains its relevance to the facts and how it can be applied or distinguished to support logical arguments about how the Issue(s) will be resolved
Minimal

1.0
The discussion considers some of the relevant legal principles but does not apply those principles to the key facts to support logical arguments about how the Issue(s) will be resolved
Effective

1.5
The discussion considers the application of most of the relevant legal principles to the key facts but the arguments are not clear or are incomplete
Outstanding

2.0
The discussion is a clear and comprehensive analysis of the relevant legal principles and their application to the facts to support logical arguments about how the Issue(s) will be resolved
Conclusion
1 pts

The Conclusion is stated and provides an overview of how the arguments in the Application section address the Issue(s).
Minimal

The Conclusion is supported by some of the arguments but does not explain how they address the Issue
Effective

The Conclusion is supported by most of the arguments but the explanation of how those arguments address the Issue(s) is not clear or is incomplete
Outstanding

The Conclusion is well supported by arguments in the Application section and clearly explains how those arguments address the Issue(s
Presentation/Collaboration
2 pts

Participation in analysis development and presentation.
Minimal

1.00
Speaker(s) does not present in a clear voice, speaks with no emphasis, and reads simply from the presentation.
Time management was not performed. Not all members of the group contributed in the presentation.
Effective

1.5
Speaking voice is fairly clear, with some emphasis. Some reading from screen.
Time management was performed well. All members of the group contributed in some manner to the presentation.
Outstanding

2.0
Speaker(s) present in a clear voice, with emphasis.
Time management is excellent. All members of the group contributed an equal amount to attaining the desired presentation duration.
Individual Collaboration
2 pts

Participation on discussion board, file sharing and other demonstrative collaboration.
Minimal

1.00
Group member has contributed minimally to the group work,
Effective

1.5
Group member has contributed in some significant manner to group work.
Outstanding

2.0
Group member has consistently and significantly contributed to group work.



Keywords:
  • Case Brief, Legal, Case Study

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Add to Gallery

Add to Gallery

Let others view this rubric in Rubric Gallery.
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98