Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Project Report rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Project Report
General Project Report
Rubric Code:
BXB23X4
By
Zhansaya
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Project report
100 %
Report rubrics for Computer Science subject projects
A
Excellent
90 pts
B
Good
75 pts
C
Acceptable
60 pts
D
Poor
50 pts
F
Fail
0 pts
Organization of Report
10 %
A
- Report is clear and logical.
- Reader can easily follow line of reasoning.
- Creates clear internal divisions (introduction, body, and conclusion, abstract)
- All relevant appendices and supporting documents are included (tables, features, code)
B
- Report is generally clear.
- A few minor points may be confusing.
- Constructs adequate internal divisions that help the reader navigate the text
- Some appendices and supporting documents are included
C
- Reader can follow Report with effort.
- Organization is not well thought out.
- Many organizational elements present, but there is a weak logical flow
- Lacks important appendices or supporting documents
D
- Reader can not find main parts.
- Organization is confused.
- A few organizational elements present, but there is a weak logical flow
- Absent of important appendices or supporting documents
F
- Report is very confusing and unclear.
- Reader cannot follow it.
- Internal divisions are unclear or absents
- Supporting elements not present or not tied into text
Clarity of Purpose
10 %
A
- Purpose clearly explains what was to be discovered.
- The writer's purpose is readily apparent to the reader.
B
- Purpose is not clearly focused on what was to be discovered.
- Writing occasionally digress from the purpose.
C
- Sentence present but does not explain purpose.
- Purpose is not always clear.
D
- Purpose present but does not related to project.
- Purpose is not always clear.
F
- Purpose is absent or not written properly.
- Purpose is generally unclear to the reader.
Content
20 %
A
- Information clearly and effectively supports a central purpose or thesis.
- Displays a thoughtful, in- depth analysis of a sufficiently limited topic.
- Reader gains insights.
B
- Information provides firm support for thesis.
- Displays evidence of a basic analysis of a sufficiently limited topic.
- Reader gains some insights.
C
- Information supports thesis at times.
- Analysis is basic or general. - Reader gains few insights.
D
- Paper does not successfully identify thesis.
- Analysis is vague or not evident.
- Reader is confused or may be misinformed.
F
- Paper does not successfully identify thesis.
- Analysis is vague or not evident.
- Reader is confused or may be misinformed.
Data/Analysis of Data
25 %
A
- Well written qualitative sentences with no inferences.
- Quantitative data chart, graph or picture contain proper units and labels are present.
- Calculations clearly shown, if applicable.
- Sentences provide clear explanation for the meaning of your data, if applicable.
B
- Qualitative sentences contain no inferences.
- Quantitative data chart, graph or picture lacks proper units or labels.
- Some calculations are absent or not clearly shown.
- Sentences provide an explanation for the meaning of your data, if applicable.
C
- Qualitative sentences contain inferences.
- Qualitative data chart, graph or picture is incomplete or indiscernible.
- Sentences are present but provide no clear explanation of data or do not make specific references to the data.
D
- Qualitative sentences contain inferences.
- Qualitative data chart, graph or picture is absent or not fully demonstrated.
- Sentences are not presented.
F
- Data section is absent, qualitative sentences missing.
- Quantitative data is missing from a data chart, graph or picture.
- Sentences are not presented.
Conclusion/Results
20 %
A
- All categories are well reasoned and show critical thinking with deep analysis of the concepts being explored.
B
- All categories are reasoned and show some critical thinking with analysis of the concepts being explored. Some errors present
C
- All categories are present but demonstrate a surface level understanding of the the concepts being explored
D
- A few categories/explanations are demonstrated.
F
- Explanations is absent.
Writing Guidelines
15 %
A
- Scientific vocabulary present and used correctly.
- No spelling or grammatical errors.
- Scientific writing style is evident.
B
- Minor problems exist with writing style, organization, formatting, scientific vocabulary.
- Some mistakes on spelling and grammar.
- Scientific writing style is exists.
C
- Multiple problems exist with writing style, organization, formatting.
- Spelling and grammar problems in some points.
- Scientific writing style is not proper.
D
- Serious problems exist with writing style, organization, formatting.
- Spelling and grammar problems.
- Scientific writing style is absent.
F
- Writing style, organization, formatting are not clear.
- Spelling and grammar serious problems.
- Scientific writing style is absent.
Subjects:
Engineering
Science
Types:
Project
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.