Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: So You Think You Can Be A Citizen? Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
So You Think You Can Be A Citizen? Rubric
Rubric Code:
BX887WA
By
ljimenez2015
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Political Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Standards
Poor
0 pts
Fair
5 pts
Good
10 pts
Excellent
15 pts
LAFS.8.W.2.6
Poor
Poor
The student does not show any evidence of using technology or technology research to collaborate alongside their partner to create a final result.
Fair
Fair
The student shows minimal evidence of using technology or technology research to collaborate alongside their partner to create a final result.
Good
Good
The student shows an adequate amount of evidence of using technology or technology research to collaborate alongside their partner to create a final result.
Excellent
Excellent
The student effectively shows evidence of using technology or technology research to collaborate alongside their partner to create a final result.
SS.8.C.1.1
Poor
Poor
The student does not include any of the steps of naturalization in their final result. The project describes only their own exam.
Fair
Fair
The student includes very few steps or inaccurate steps in their project along with their own citizenship exam questions.
Good
Good
The student accurately includes the steps of naturalization in their final project, but may be missing an important detail or a step.
Excellent
Excellent
The student effectively includes all steps of naturalization and all the important details.
Video Presentation
Poor
Poor
Student did not submit a video presentation or the presentation was not relevant to what was asked of the student.
Fair
Fair
The student failed to include their own questions in a video format, but submitted it in a different way.
Good
Good
The presentation was submitted in video format, with accurate depictions of their exam and in a creative way that displayed what they learned, but may have been missing a few key points.
Excellent
Excellent
The presentation was submitted in video format, with accurate depictions of their exam and in a creative way that displayed what they learned.
Clarity
Poor
Poor
The presentation is filled with media errors that show that the student did not revise their video at all before showing it to the class.
Fair
Fair
The presentation has more than just a few media errors that show that the student revised their video too quickly before showing it to the class.
Good
Good
The presentation has 1 or 2 media errors that show that the student did revise the video before showing it to the class.
Excellent
Excellent
The presentation has no media errors that show that the student definitely did revise their video before showing it to the class.
Subjects:
Political Science
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Political Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.