Skip to main content
iRubric: Evaluation of Online Teaching Tools Presentation rubric

iRubric: Evaluation of Online Teaching Tools Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Evaluation of Online Teaching Tools Presentation 
Evaluation of Online Teaching Tools Presentation
Rubric Code: B2X5833
By Esaete
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
  EXCELLENT

4 pts

GOOD

3 pts

FAIR

2 pts

POOR

1 pts

POINTS GAINED

(N/A)

GROUP WORK RUBRIC PER STUDENT
Presentation and Organization

EXCELLENT

Uses clear and organized PowerPoint slides or other visual displays to represent and communicate the objective(s) of the presentation.

_Presentation is lively and delivered with enthusiasm.

_Presents in a way to capture the audience's attention.
GOOD

Uses appropriate and accurate PowerPoint slides or other visual displays to represent and communicate the objective(s) of the presentation, but may not be clear.

_Attempts to be lively and enthusiastic but does not come across as natural.

_Presents in a way the audience can understand the main points.
FAIR

Some errors are evident in the PowerPoint slides or other visual displays to communicate the objective(s) of the presentaion.

_May not be able to persuade the participants with the presentation.

_Presents information out of order resulting in confusion regarding the main points.
POOR

No usage of visual representations or major errors exist when communicating the objective(s) of the presentation.

_Presentation does not match the topic, audience or purpose.

_Information is disorganized.
POINTS GAINED
Group Member Collaboration

EXCELLENT

Allows group members enough time to work together during the session.

-Walks around and offers support to participants.
GOOD

Usually allows group members enough time to work together during the session.

-Available to help particpants if they ask.
FAIR

Does not allow group members enough time to work together during the session.

-Sometimes helps participants or asks others to help them.
POOR

Does not allow group members to work together during the session.

-Does not offer help to participants during or after the session is over.
POINTS GAINED
Focus on the Task

EXCELLENT

Focuses on the task and what needs to be done for participants to understand the presenter's objective(s).
GOOD

Focuses on the task and what needs to be done for the participants to understand the presenter's objective(s) most of the time.
FAIR

Sometimes focuses on the task and what needs to be done in order for the participants to understand the presenter's objective(s).
POOR

-Does not focus on the task and what needs to be done in order for the participants to understand the presenter's objective(s).
POINTS GAINED
Learning Environment

EXCELLENT

Provides laptops with reliable internet connectivity.

_Environment was comfortable and prepared for interaction with participants.
GOOD

Most of the time, provides laptops with reliable internet connectivity.

_Environment was comfortable and prepared for interaction with participants.
FAIR

Sometimes provides laptops with internet connectivity.

_Some loss of classtime due to troubleshooting concerns.

_Environment was comfortable most of the time.
POOR

Problems with laptops or internet connectivity were evident.

_Environment was not conducive to learning.
POINTS GAINED
Online Teaching Tool Presentations

EXCELLENT

Provided useful content.

_Used real-world examples that aided in the comprehension of the subject matter.

_Presentation exceeded expectations.
Answered all questions.
GOOD

Presented useful content.

_Used examples that participants could relate to.

_Could answer most questions.
FAIR

Presented some useful content.

_Used examples that were sometimes relevant.

_Did not answer most questions.
POOR

Does not present well at all.

_Examples did not match with the subject matter.
POINTS GAINED
Purpose

EXCELLENT

Particpants understood and used one or more of the tools in their subject area.

_Students used the tools, participated in a workspace project and presented it to classroom visitors.
GOOD

Particpants mostly understood and used a specific tool in their subject area.

_Students used the tool, participated in a workspace project and presented it to classroom visitors.
FAIR

Particpants attempted to use a specific tool in their subject area, but experienced problems.

_Students attempted to use the tool, but experienced problems.
POOR

Particpants did not understand the tools.

_Did not seek help from the presenter.
POINTS GAINED






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16