Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Writing a review rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Writing a review rubric
Writing a review rubric
Students write a review about a self-selected topic after reading and examining the components of effective reviews in published magazines.
Rubric Code:
B24X83C
By
MsMcKellips
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
6-8, 9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Write a Review
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Unsatisfactory
(N/A)
Ideas: Summary of key components
20 pts
Excellent
Writer summarizes the topic, including enough info to satisfy; examples and evidence from summary strongly support reviewer’s opinion
Good
Summary is a little too long or not long enough but is not as compelling; fewer details from the movie and evidence from summary to support reviewer’s opinion
Fair
Summary is much too short or much too long; may be vague or tell too much; few details about the topic and little evidence from summary to support reviewer’s opinion
Unsatisfactory
An insignificant summary; no details and little evidence from summary to support reviewer’s opinion
Evaluation of various aspects
10 pts
Excellent
Contains an exceptional and knowledgeable evaluation of many aspects of the topic. The reader would view the writer as a recognizable expert.
Good
Contains sufficient and basic knowledge of many aspects of the topic. The reader would view the writer as a competent evaluator of the topic.
Fair
Contains less than sufficient and basic knowledge of many aspects of the topic. The reader would view the writer as a less than competent evaluator of the topic.
Unsatisfactory
Contains insufficient and unsatisfactory knowledge of many aspects of the topic. The reader would view the writer as an incompetent evaluator of the topic.
Organization: Effective organization and flow
10 pts
Excellent
Review is strongly organized with clear transitions and logical connections that create a sense of being tightly woven together
Good
Review is organized and most transitions and connections are clear, but either organization is lacking or the sense of flow is abrupt
Fair
Review lacks strong organization; jumps around too much or lacks effective transitions; not in logical order
Unsatisfactory
Review is choppy or in cohesive; organization is unclear; few effective transitions
Voice: Persuasive strategies
10 pts
Excellent
The writer competently used many strategies to persuade the reader of the value of the item being reviewed.
Good
The writer used sufficient strategies to persuade the reader of the value of the item being reviewed.
Fair
Writer used basic strategies to persuade the reader of the value of the item being reviewed.
Unsatisfactory
Writer incompetently used persuasive strategies or underutilized strategies to persuade the reader of the value of the item being reviewed.
.
Word Choice
10 pts
Vocabulary
Excellent
The student made a highly conscious effort to use subject specific vocabulary. The student sought interesting and varied vocabulary throughout the article.
Good
The student attempted to use subject specific vocabulary. The student sought some interesting and varied vocabulary throughout the article.
Fair
The student attempted to use subject-specific vocabulary. The student sought limited new vocabulary throughout article.
Unsatisfactory
Student did not appear to attempt to use subject specific vocabulary. Student shows poor evidence of interesting and varied vocabulary throughout article.
Fluency: Sentence Structure and Fluency
10 pts
Excellent
They well constructed every sentence, with no run-on or fragmented sentences. Each sentence is clear and concise, and well-developed. They well supported ideas and details through a variety of sentence types.
Good
The majority of sentences are well constructed with few run-on or fragmented sentences. The majority of sentences are clear concise and well-developed. Ideas and details are mostly supported through a varitey of sentence types.
Fair
The majority of sentences are constructed well, although some run-on or fragmented sentences impede meaning. Some of the sentences are not clear, concise or well-developed. Ideas and details are somewhat supported through a varitey of sentence types.
Unsatisfactory
Too many sentences are not well constructed thus impeding reader understanding and enjoyment. Too many sentences are not clear concise. Lack of varitey of sentence types is evident.
Presentation: Enhancements
10 pts
Excellent
The writer competently used visual enhancements to improve the review.
Good
The writer satisfactorily used visual enhancements to improve the review.
Fair
The writer used visual enhancements in a limited way, or visual elements did not significantly improve the quality of the review.
Unsatisfactory
The writer did not use visual enhancements or visual elements, or the elements used detracted from the overall quality of the review.
Final evaluation
10 pts
Excellent
The review offers a clear conclusion, evaluation, or rating with a clear recommendation to others.
Good
Conclusion is satisfactory but is lacking of a clear final evaluation or rating.
Fair
A conclusion is present, but it's weak and lacking of a clear final evaluation
Unsatisfactory
No conclusion is present.
Conventions
10 pts
Excellent
The writer “cleaned up” the piece, checking for correct capitalization, punctuation, spelling, paragraphing, grammar, and usage.
Good
The writer cleaned up the piece in some places, checking for correct capitalization, punctuation, spelling, paragraphing, grammar, and usage.
Fair
The writer hardly cleaned up the piece, checking for correct capitalization, punctuation, spelling, paragraphing, grammar, and usage.
Unsatisfactory
The writer left no evidence of cleaning up the piece, checking for correct capitalization, punctuation, spelling, paragraphing, grammar, and usage.
Keywords:
review
Subjects:
English
Education
Types:
Reading
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Reading rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.