Skip to main content
iRubric: Expanding to Contemporary Art rubric

iRubric: Expanding to Contemporary Art rubric

 
find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   apply to...   delete   Do more...
Expanding to Contemporary Art 
Supporting paper for contemporary art project, the expanded view of major discipline/course.
Rubric Code: B22987A
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate


Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Initial Proposal

Content & Development


(This row will apply only to previously submitted SEA proposal. 10% weight average or maximum of 10 points)

Poor

- Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting.
- Paper does not follow guidelines/guide questions and lacks needed information according to given concept/proposed project.
Fair

- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Research is inadequate or does not address course concepts.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
- Some padding of paragraphs
Good

- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are not well stated and well supported.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear but details are incomplete.
- Paper is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
Excellent

Content is thorough, accurate, persuasive and relates to a specific purpose
- Major points are specific, stated clearly, and are well-supported.
- research is primary
- Paper follows designated guidelines and format
- -All references are from relevant
Concept, Theme & Originality

demonstrate innovation in concept, critical thinking of issue/topic as theme or issue, investigate the intersection between art and everyday

Poor

- output/artwork lacks creativity and original thought. Theme is very weak, trite, stereotypical or somewhat copied
- theme is not fully developed
Fair

- artworks shows evidence that an idea was tried but it lacks originality.
- average degree of originality; theme is present with little elaboration.
Good

- Above average degree of originality throughout.
- theme is present with some elaboration
Excellent

- Superior degree of originality exhibited throughout, very unique solution of output/presentation; theme has been explored and elaborated on to a high degree
- complex solution
Creative use of Materials/Medium

ability to demonstrate understanding of tools and processes, technical skills of the media used

Poor

-evidence of poor craftsmanship or lack of technical understanding.
-poor application of use of materials/technology and/or resources
Fair

-the finished output/artwork as project with level of skill, but lacks quality or finishing touches or could have been improved upon with more effort.
-Below average craftsmanship
Good

- the artwork/project is finished with a high level of skill, but lacks a few finishing details or touches or high quality. With a little more effort, the works would be outstanding.
Excellent

-the artwork/output/project is outstanding and finished with a great deal of care and attention to detail
Artwork/Project

Visual output presentation

Poor

The visual output lacks the qualities with reference to content and form of contemporary art, and applied specifications in t he development of form does not complement well with the meaning being conveyed.
The search for something new and original in every new art were not much effort.
Fair

The visual output less demonstrates the qualities with reference to content and form of contemporary art, and applied specifications in the development of form doe not conform well with the meaning being conveyed.
The search for something new and original in every new art were not given consideration or attention.
Good

The visual output somewhat demonstrates that you are aware of the qualities with reference to content and form of contemporary art.
The search for something new and original in every new art were familiar but not striking work of art.
Excellent

The visual output clearly demonstrates that you are ware of the qualities with reference to content and form of contemporary art.
The search for something new and original is every new art was challenging, also a very striking feature of the work
Content of Supporting Paper

Existing knowledge, research, and/or views. submitted paper, follows guidelines and format of supporting paper (title, introduction, concept, artwork/project description, project team and visual documentation); the analysis is determined in part by how much information is provided and constructed by student.
content is comprehensiv and accurate

Poor

-benchmark.
-presents information from irrelevant sources or personal opinions and assumptions representing limited points of view/approaches.
-lacks significant information which supports the analysis or claim, mostly assumptions and opinions
Fair

-milestone.
-presents information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches
-presents enough information but did not provide an accurate analysis or enough discussion
Good

-milestone.
-presents in-depth discussion of knowledge/information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
-presents information and formal details but significanty short
Excellent

-captsone.
-synthesizes in-depth discussion of knowledge/information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches from across disciplines or from relevant subdisciplines
-presents sufficient information and research to create a compelling analysis as support paper










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2021 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n17