Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: World Music Games rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
World Music Games
World Music Games
Students will use information learned in their World Music Listening Unit of study to prepare a review game in small groups.
Rubric Code:
AXW3A94
By
jlouden
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Music
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Game Appearance
Poor
1 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Bonus
2 pts
Materials
Poor
Materials used on the game board are not in good condition. Words are difficult to read. Spaces are unclear.
Good
Materials are in decent condition. Words are readable. Spaces are clear.
Excellent
Materials are colorful and in excellent condition. Words are written neatly and creatively. Spaces are clear and interesting.
Bonus
Materials are sturdy and creatively put together. Pieces are creative.
Rules
Poor
Rules are not written down. Rules are difficult to impossible to follow and understand. They do not assist game play.
Good
Rules are written down but are confusing to follow. They assist only slightly in following game play.
Excellent
Rules are written down and easy to follow. They assist in following game play.
Bonus
Rules are typed.
Cards
Poor
Less than 50 cards or questions were created. Questions did not cover the material.
Good
50 cards were created but the questions were not interesting or did not cover the material well.
Excellent
50 cards were created. The questions were interesting and covered the material well.
Bonus
More than 50 cards were created. The questions were creative and fun.
Game Play
Poor
1 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Bonus
2 pts
Work Ethic
Poor
Students were not on task and the game suffered because of poor work ethic.
Good
Students were on task most of the time, but were obviously not meeting their potential.
Excellent
Students were on task consistently and reached their potential for the project.
Bonus
Students spent time outside of class working on the project.
Participation
Poor
Students played the other games, but were severely argumentative or disruptive.
Good
Students played the other games well, but were mildly argumentative or disruptive.
Excellent
Students played the other games well, participated fairly, and remained in good spirits until completion.
Bonus
Students showed enthusiasm and good sportsmanship.
Accuracy in Response
Poor
Students were not able to answer the majority of questions correctly.
Good
Students were able to answer about half of the questions correctly.
Excellent
Students were able to answer most of the questions correctly.
Bonus
Students answered all but one or two of the questions correctly.
Game Leadership
Poor
1 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Bonus
2 pts
Emcee
Poor
Emcee was not prepared and did not read questions correctly. Emcee did not know how to pronounce vocab words.
Good
Emcee was prepared but unenthusiastic. Emcee read questions correctly about half the time and did not know how to pronounce many of the vocab words.
Excellent
Emcee was enthusiastic. Emcee read questions correctly the majority of the time, and knew how to pronounce most major vocab words.
Bonus
Emcee tried very well to be interesting and fun. Emcee pronounced all major vocab words correctly.
Score Keeper
Poor
Score keeper did not know how to keep score, relied completely on others, and
Good
Score keeper relied on others to help keep score and only kept accurate about half the time.
Excellent
Score keeper did not rely on others for help and kept the score accurately the whole time.
Bonus
Score keeper kept the score neatly and large enough for both teams playing the game to see and follow along.
Referee
Poor
Referee was not involved in game play most of the time and did not know whether answers given by players were right or wrong.
Good
Referee responded to an answer's being right or wrong with accuracy about half the time. They followed the game about half of the time.
Excellent
Referee knew the answers to questions as being either right or wrong and followed the game well.
Bonus
Referee invented a creative way to show right or wrong answers to players.
Subjects:
Music
Types:
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Music rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.