Skip to main content
iRubric: Feldman Method Rubric

iRubric: Feldman Method Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Feldman Method Rubric 
Feldman Method Rubric
Assesses student understanding and application of art criticism steps using Professor S's adaptation of Feldman's 4 step Art Criticism model
Rubric Code: AXBWX2C
By mjthayer
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Feldman Method of Art criticism
  Exemplary Work 10-12

(N/A)

Good/Met the Standards 7-9

(N/A)

Fair/Standards Lacking 4-6

(N/A)

Poor/Weak or non-existent 1-3

(N/A)

Description

Exemplary Work 10-12

Student makes an exemplary and detailed description of the elements and principles of design seen in the artwork. Student uses descriptive adjectives and words as if the listener could draw the artwork according to what was written. Student provides a color copy of the image.
Good/Met the Standards 7-9

Student makes a good description of the elements and principles of design seen in the artwork. Student uses a fair amount of descriptive adjectives and words as if the listener could draw the artwork according to what was written. Student provides a color copy of the image.
Fair/Standards Lacking 4-6

Student makes a fair description of the elements and principles of design seen in the artwork. Student does not use many descriptive adjectives and words as if the listener could draw the artwork according to what was written. Student provides a black and white of the image.
Poor/Weak or non-existent 1-3

Student makes a poor and detailed description of the elements and principles of design seen in the artwork. Student uses few or no descriptive adjectives and words as if the listener could draw the artwork according to what was written. Student provides no copy of the image.
Analysis

Exemplary Work 10-12

Student makes an exemplary and detailed analysis of the artwork by examining the relationships between the different Elements of Art and the Principles of Design.
Good/Met the Standards 7-9

Student makes a good and detailed analysis of the artwork by examining the relationships between the different Elements of Art and the Principles of Design.
Fair/Standards Lacking 4-6

Student makes a fair analysis of the artwork by examining the relationships between the different Elements of Art and the Principles of Design.
Poor/Weak or non-existent 1-3

Student makes a poor analysis of the artwork by examining the relationships between the different Elements of Art and the Principles of Design.
Interpretation

Exemplary Work 10-12

Student forms a reasonable hypothesis about the subject matter and the symbolic or metaphorical meaning of the artwork and is able to support this with evidence from the artwork. Explains why the artist made the choices he/she did.
Good/Met the Standards 7-9

Student identifies the literal meaning of the artwork. Gives a partial interpretation of symbolic meaning with some evidence from the artwork.
Fair/Standards Lacking 4-6

Student can relate how the work makes him/her feel personally. Does not give evidence from artwork, does not talk about the symbolic meaning of the artwork.
Poor/Weak or non-existent 1-3

Student finds it difficult to interpret any meaning in the work.
Judgement

Exemplary Work 10-12

Student locates the work in an art historical context. Student uses multiple criteria to judge the artwork, such as composition, creativity, design, communication of ideas, successfulness of the image. Talks about what the artist was trying to communicate and gives clear reasons.
Good/Met the Standards 7-9

Student locates the work in an art historical context. Student uses 1-2 criteria to judge the artwork. Tells whether the artwork is successful or not and talks about what the artist was trying to communicate but could be clearer.
Fair/Standards Lacking 4-6

Student locates the work in an art historical context. Student tries to use aesthetic criteria to judge artwork, but does not apply the criteria accurately. Does not explain whether or not the artwork is successful.
Poor/Weak or non-existent 1-3

Student locates the work in an art historical context. Student evaluates valuates work as good or bad based on personal taste only. Student doesn't comment on what the artist was trying to communicate. Student does not explain whether or not the artwork is successful.



Keywords:
  • art criticism



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16