Skip to main content
iRubric: Rubric:  written comprehensive exam of  DNS students

iRubric: Rubric: written comprehensive exam of DNS students

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rubric: written comprehensive exam of DNS students 
This rubric includes the elements for the evaluation of a written comprehensive exam for DNS students. It is divided in five areas: depth and breath of knowledge, commitment to methods and analysis, scholarship, argumentation and quality of written document.
Rubric Code: A57223
Ready to use
Private Rubric
Subject: Nursing  
Type: Exam  
Grade Levels: Graduate, Post Graduate

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
1 % Enter rubric description
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Knowledge
30 %

Historical, philosophical and theoretical foundation to development of nursing

Poor

Student presents one third of the required elements: knowledge of relevant disciplinary literature,comprehension of disciplinary theories and concepts, understanding of important theories and concepts from relevant related disciplines, ability to develop theoretical models
Fair

Student presents two thirds of the required elements:knowledge of relevant disciplinary literature,comprehension of disciplinary theories and concepts, understanding of important theories and concepts from relevant related disciplines, ability to develop theoretical models
Good

Totally presents knowledge of relevant disciplinary literature,comprehension of disciplinary theories and concepts, understanding of important theories and concepts from relevant related disciplines, ability to develop theoretical models
Commitment to methods and analysis
30 %

Charge, obligation, responsibility with rigor or research methos and analysis

Poor

Comply with one third of required elements: Understanding of the methods'advantages and disadvantages, use of appropiate research methods, commitment to logical, ethical and epistemological dimension for conducting research.
Fair

Comply with two thirds of required elements:Understanding of the methods'advantages and disadvantages, use of appropiate research methods, commitment to logical, ethical and epistemological dimension for conducting research.
Good

Totally presents content of research methods' advantages and disadvantages, use of appropiate research methods, commitment to logical, ethical and epistemological dimension for conducting research.
Scholarship
15 %

Application of a body of principles in writting the comprehensive exam

Poor

Comply with one third of required elements:Support the answer with pertinent references,( current, classic and/or significant and written in scholarly manner ( APA-correct cover page, heading levels, citations and reference page)
Fair

Comply with two thirds of required elements: support the answer with pertinent references,( current, classic and/or significant and written in scholarly manner ( APA-correct cover page, heading levels, citations and reference page)
Good

Totally presents the answer with pertinent references,( current, classic and/or significant and written in scholarly manner ( APA-correct cover page, heading levels, citations and reference page)
Quality of written communication
5 %

A group of characteristics that describes the mechanics of language, clarity and format of a narrative and graphic document.

Poor

Comply with one third of required elements: Correct usage or mechanics of language (spelling, syntax, punctuation, paragraphing), the writting is clear and direct, sentences are complete and to the point, document is formatted, tables, charts and graphs are cleary labeled and formatted
Fair

Comply with two thirds of required elements: Correct usage or mechanics of language (spelling, syntax, punctuation, paragraphing), the writting is clear and direct, sentences are complete and to the point, document is formatted, tables, charts and graphs are cleary labeled and formatted.
Good

Totally presents correct usage or mechanics of language (spelling, syntax, punctuation, paragraphing), the writting is clear and direct, sentences are complete and to the point, document is formatted, tables, charts and graphs are cleary labeled. formatted and
Argumentation
20 %

Application of logical reasonging (inductive or deductive) to reach to a conclusion. Requires a group of higher level thinking skills

Poor

Comply with one third of required elements: critical thinking (contrasting and evaluating) in answering questions, with logic, accuracy, precision and cogency (persuasiveness of argument)
Fair

Comply with two thirds of required elements: critical thinking (contrasting and evaluating) in answering questions, with logic, accuracy, precision and cogency (persuasiveness of argument)
Good

Totally presents critical thinking (contrasting and evaluating) in answering questions, with logic, accuracy, precision and cogency (persuasiveness of argument)



Keywords:
  • nursing comprehensive exam, knowledge, argumentation, critical thinking, scholarship and methods and analysis

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Add to Gallery

Let others view this rubric in Rubric Gallery.

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16