- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: E-Learning Rubric during COVID

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
E-Learning Rubric during COVID RTI Field paper Students are to interview members of a school about the collaboration process in the time of virtual teaching. Pros and Cons of collaborating virtually. Rubric Code: A2X65A7 By abnettj Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Paper component
	Excellent 5 points (N/A)	Good 3-4 points (N/A)	Fair 1-2 points (N/A)	Poor 0-1 point (N/A)
Interview Questions	Excellent Asked questions that were very pertinent to understanding of the successes and difficulty of co-teaching and collaboration within the school setting while virtual.	Good Asked questions that were somewhat pertinent to understanding of the successes and difficulty of co-teaching and collaboration within the school setting while virtual.	Fair Asked questions that were minimally pertinent to understanding of the successes and difficulty of co-teaching and collaboration within the school setting while virtual.	Poor Leaves out questions and responses that pertinent to understanding of the successes and difficulty of co-teaching and collaboration within the school setting while virtual.
Description	Excellent Student thoughtfully and articulately wrote their opinions and observations of how teachers were collaborating and co-teaching virtually.	Good Students wrote sequentially their opinions and observations of how teachers were collaborating and co-teaching virtually.	Fair Student wrote some of their opinions and observations of how teachers were collaborating and co-teaching virtually. Write up was disjointed.	Poor Students write up does not depict how teachers were collaborating and co-teaching virtually.
writing style	Excellent Authors' questions and writing are comprehensive and flow in a logical order. Paper is well organized. There are no errors in grammar, spelling, or syntax.	Good Authors' questions and writing are good and flow in a logical order. Authors makes good points, but these are not presented in a clearly outlined or logically flowing manner. Topics jump without clear sequence. There are 2-3 errors in grammar, spelling, or syntax.	Fair Authors' questions and writing are superficial and don't consistently flow in a logical order. Topics sometime jump without clear sequence. Points are difficult to find and/or follow. Little to no logical order evident. There are 4-5 errors in grammar, spelling, or syntax.	Poor Questions are not comprehensive and writing has little to no logical order evident and may even appear in an illogical manner, or is difficult to follow. There are 6 or more errors in grammar, spelling, or syntax.