iRubric: Teamwork and FLL Values Rubric

No clearly-defined roles Not clear who completed which tasks and/or very uneven distribution of work Team members not collaborative Time management is poor or purely directed by the coach

Loose role assignments Uneven work distribution Team members will help each other, if asked Time management skills are weak

Defined roles Work is distributed fairly – but with individual focus only Team members assist each other without being asked Team mentions learning time management

Clearly defined roles Workload is distributed fairly and team members understand each other’s role Team members fill each other’s roles (happily!), if needed Team members give concrete examples of learning time management

A problem was identified, but no steps were taken to identify a solution One team member used power to reach their desired outcome One person’s ideas are used Team members working against each other Coercion and/or confrontation dominate

A problem was identified, but the chosen solution was inadequate to some team members Some team members didn’t accept the solution Simple majority had input at meetings Decisions made by simple majority without collaborative discussion Team coexists peacefully

A problem was identified and there is compromise evident in the solution Team tested various solutions to solve the problem Cooperation is a dominant theme Decisions made by most of the team, however focuses on individual tasks Team collaborates well

A problem was identified and the team worked together to find a solution Various solutions were tested and then incorporated Team accepts input from all and sses the big picture in their overall goals Team members show equality and value each other’s roles by decisions being made by the entire team Collaboration and co-ownership are dominant themes with the members recognizing interdependence

No clear enthusiasm for science, engineering or technology Team doesn’t mention new skills acquired

Some members show an interest in science, engineering or technology Limited attention paid to new skills acquired

Team shows a keen interest in subject matter, but limited use of concrete examples Team implies new skills acquired

Group articulates a clear understanding of the FLL experience Team gives concrete examples of new skills acquired and their interest in the subject areas