iRubric: The Vietnam War rubric

There is little information and irrelevant facts. Group shows little to no understanding of the war.

A few facts are presented but are relevant. Group shows some understanding of the war.

Many relevant facts are presented about the war. Group shows general understanding of the war, can explain cause of war, who won, and the aftermath.

Many relevant facts on the war are presented. Group showed deep understanding of the war. Included information on what happened before the war, why the war occurred, what happened during the war, who was involved, how it ended, and the aftermath.

One to no opinions are presented. Idea and opinion on US involvement is not supported, not relevant to topic, unclear, does not persuade audience.

2-3 opinions are presented. Ideas and opinions on US involvement have some support but not enough information to persuade audience.

3-5 opinions are presented. Ideas and opinions on US involvement are supported persuade the audience.

3-5 opinions are presented. Ideas and opinions on US involvement are original, well supported and very persuasive to the audience. Counter-argument is included.

Presentation is incomplete, slides are inconsistent, show no organization or pattern and are hard to read. speakers are disorganized and do not clearly communicate information. More than 5 spelling errors.

Presentation is somewhat organized with little logical sequence. Slides are a little hard to follow, but show some consistent patterns and organization. Speakers have some difficulty communicating information. 3-4 spelling errors

Presentation is organized. All but one slides are consistent, show pattern and are readable. Speakers communicate ideas fairly well. 1-2 spelling errors.

Presentation is very well organized in a logical sequence. The slide are easy to read and they look consistent and show a pattern. Speakers communicate ideas clearly and transition well. No spelling errors.