Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Primary Academic Article Presentation Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Primary Academic Article Presentation Rubric
Primary Academic Article Presentation Rubric
This rubric is designed to assess student presentation of a primary academic article.
Rubric Code:
WX9W425
By
Eastutzman
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Finance
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Presentation Rubric
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
OK
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Introduction
2 pts
Excellent
Introduction uses an attention-grabber, previews the main findings of the article and makes compelling connections to the field of finance.
Good
Introduction is missing ONE of the opening elements: attention-grabber, preview of findings or compelling connections.
OK
Introduction is missing TWO of the opening elements.
Poor
Speech begins without an official introduction.
Organization
3 pts
Excellent
Presentation is very organized and was very easy to follow. Transitions between topics are smooth.
Good
Presentation is fairly organized and pretty followable. Transitions might have been slightly discontinuous but did not take away geatly from the overall presentation.
OK
Presentation is not clearly organized. Transitions between topics are jumpy or awkward.
Poor
Presentation lacks organization. Presentation lacks order and is difficult to follow.
Content
8 pts
Weight
Excellent
Student has a stronghold on the content, methodology and conclusions of the article and is able to effectively "teach" the class. No mistakes are made with regard to content knowledge.
Good
Student has a basic understanding of the content. Articles findings are effectively communicated but show shortcomings in mastery of the material or in explanation of findings.
OK
Student has only a superficial or limited understanding of content. Mistakes were made during the presentation. The main findings of the article, methodology or conclusions of the paper are explained incorrectly or not explained clearly.
Poor
Student has little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation and does not communicate the findings or methodology of the article clearly.
Conclusion
2 pts
Excellent
Conclusion reviews information presented, restates the findings and ends with a clear summary of the "take home points" of the article.
Good
Conclusion fails to do ONE of the following: review of information, restatement of findings or summarizing of take home points.
OK
Conclusion fails to do TWO of the previous criteria.
Poor
Speech ends without an official conclusion.
Visuals
4 pts
Excellent
Student makes excellent use of visual aids. Employs PowerPoint, and handouts to effectively communicate key messages. Visuals are visually pleasing, non-crowded and work well to support the speaker and convey information.
Good
Visuals are generally good. Small mistakes may be present but do not interfere with the effective functioning of the aids.
OK
Mistakes in the visuals are distracting from the presentation. Visuals do not serve to effectively communicate main findings.
Poor
Visuals are missing.
Stage Presence
4 pts
Excellent
Student speaks clearly and succinctly, maintains eye contact with all members of the audience, gestures natually, and shows preparedness. Minimal use of notes.
Good
Student makes eye contact only with professor or seems stiff and unnatural. Student relies too heavily on notes or rambles.
OK
Student reads from notes or seems unrehearsed.
Poor
Student is obviously unprepared or "winging" it.
Question & Answer
2 pts
Excellent
Student answers questions directly and clearly. Answers to questions are succinct, correct and brief. During Q&A, it's apparent that the student has a deep mastery of the material.
Good
Student provides good answers to the questions but may ramble. Answers address the question directly. Students knowledge of the material appears deeper than is evident in the initial presentation.
OK
Student doesn't answer the questions directly or the answer is off topic. Student rambles or filibusters in order to seem well prepared.
Poor
Student cannot answer the majority of questions answered, provides off-topic answers and / or seems undereducated on the topic.
Keywords:
presentation, research
Subjects:
English
Finance
Science
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.