Skip to main content
iRubric: Chinese Videoed Skit "I Am Better Than You" Rubric

iRubric: Chinese Videoed Skit "I Am Better Than You" Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Chinese Videoed Skit "I Am Better Than You" Rubric 
Chinese Video " I Am a Chinese Teacher" Rubric
This rubric is designed for project "I Am Better Than You" skit. This project is due on 2/7, 2014
Rubric Code: SCXAAW
By lilychen77
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Performance Rubric
  Poor

2 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Script Plot (5 pts)

Script Aspect
Poor

Script is incomplete with major gaps; length is too short
Fair

Script is complete but not logical; needs more length.
Good

Script is complete, logical story with a beginning, middle and end.
Excellent

Script has an in depth, complete, logical story with a beginning, middle and end.
Completion (5 pts )

Script Aspect
Poor

The video only has one skit. The skit has less than 5 dialogues long only in English, not concluded in Chinese comparative sentences.
Fair

The video includes two skits written by each of the team members. Each skit has less than 8 dialogues long, mainly in English and concluded in only one Chinese comparative sentence.
Good

The video includes two skits written by each of the team members. Each skit is about 10 dialogues long, mainly in English and concluded in two Chinese comparative sentences.
Excellent

The video includes two skits written by each of the team members. Each skit is above 10 dialogues long, mainly in English, and concluded in two Chinese comparative sentences.
Vocabulary & Grammar (5 pts)

Script Aspect
Poor

Students didn't show any efforts to use newly learned vocabulary.
There were numerous grammar / spelling errors that made it difficult to understand
Fair

Students used minimum amount of new learned Chinese vocabulary to get through the presentation.
There were many grammar / spelling errors
Good

Students used new learned Chinese vocabulary effectively.
There were few grammar / spelling errors
Excellent

Students used new learned Chinese vocabulary effectively and creatively. There were hardly any grammar / spelling errors
Pronunciation (5 pt)

Performance Aspect
Poor

Students pronounced words incorrectly throughout their presentation.
Fair

Students often pronounced words incorrectly, but it showed some efforts.
Good

Students pronounced words and tones correctly most of the times.
Excellent

Students pronounced all words and tones correctly.
Fluency (5 pts)

Performance Aspect
Poor

Student presented a below average demonstration of Chinese fluency. Student read their notes the whole time.
Fair

Student presented an low average demonstration of Chinese fluency. Student read their notes most of the time.
Good

Student presented an average demonstration of Chinese fluency. Student read their notes some of the time.
Excellent

Student presented an above average fluency performance. Student did not read their notes all the time.
Creativity and Uniquenes (5 points)

Script and Performance Aspects
Poor

The students presented little creativity in their skit.
Fair

The students' presentation had few to some creative elements.
Good

The students' presentation was creative with some areas that could be improved.
Excellent

The students' work was highly creative and unique!
Effect & Enthusiamsm (5 pts)

Performance Aspects
Poor

The students put little to no effort into the presentation and the group grade suffered because of attitude.
Fair

The students could have done more to contribute and/or was not showing enthusiasm.
Good

The students showed some enthusiasm and enjoyed the presentation in certain degree.
Excellent

The students were excited with the project and enjoyed the presentation.
Use of Technology (5 pts)

Video Production Aspect
Poor

Poorly edited. Film does not flow/not convincing. Parts are hard to understand or lack structure or direction. Not well thought out.
Fair

Adequate editing. Some aspects of film do not flow together well. The end result is convincing but more direction and fluidity is needed.
Good

Good editing. There is good flow between scenes. The end result is well adapted and convincing.
Excellent

Excellent editing. Different scenes in film flow together naturally. The overall product is very convincing and well thought out.
Team Work (5 pt)

All Aspects
Poor

Not all members contributed to the project. or one or more of the project members contributed almost nothing to the production.
Fair

All members al least contributed something. Some members are far less prominent in the production and video than others.
Good

All members contributed to the project, but some members did not play as significant a role in the production as a whole.
Excellent

All members contributed an equal significant role to the film/presentation.



Keywords:
  • Chinese Skit performance rubric



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98