Skip to main content
iRubric: Video Rubric

iRubric: Video Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Video Rubric 
Presentation Rubric
Rubric for evaluating student presentations. Can be applied to any presentation. Adopted from http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html
Rubric Code: RXX6778
By khayne
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Presentation Rubric
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Introduction

Poor

Introduction is not included or does not make sense. The topic and purpose are not clear.
Fair

General introduction of the topic and purpose. Little creativity and only somewhat engaging.
Good

Introduces the topic and purpose in an engaging manner.
Excellent

Unique and memorable introduction engages the audience immediately and communicates the purpose of the piece.
Delivery

Presentation
Poor

It sounds like the presenter is reading a script. Delivery interferes with ability to understand the piece. Words often aren't clear and pacing makes it difficult to follow the piece.
Fair

It doesn't sounds like the narrator has practiced the piece. Delivery is better in some places than others, Words aren't always clear and/or pacing is uneven,
Good

Narrator has practiced the piece for smooth delivery. Words are clear and pacing is appropriate.
Excellent

Narrator sounds comfortable and has practiced the piece for an excellent delivery. Words are clear and pacing is appropriate.
Delivery

Grammar
Poor

Grammatical mistakes interfere with ability to understand the piece.
Fair

Some instances of incorrect grammar are noted (more than two).
Good

Correct grammar is used int he piece (only one or two grammatical errors).
Excellent

Correct grammar is consistently used.
Technical Production

Transitions
Poor

Much of the piece has distracting background noise. Transitions are jumpy.
Fair

There is distracting dead space and/or ambient noise. Transitions are uneven.
Good

Transitions are smooth, but dead space is occasionally heard.
Excellent

Smooth transitions throughout piece. No dead space.
Technical Production

Volume
Poor

Volume changes are highly distracting.
Fair

Volume is occasionally inconsistent.
Good

Volume is acceptable.
Excellent

Audio volume complements the presentation.
Technical Production

Length
Poor

Piece doesn't follow teacher guidelines for length of media.
Fair

N/A
Good

Piece is a bit too long or too short but close to the teacher guidlines for length of the media.
Excellent

Presenter followed teacher guidelines for the length of the media.
Images/Graphics

Helpfulness and relating
Poor

The graphics don't relate to the audio and distract from the content.
Fair

The graphics only marginally relate to the audio and aren't always helpful in communicating the content.
Good

The graphics relate to the audio and are helpful in communicating the content.
Excellent

The graphics and images contribute to a creative and effective presentation and enhance key points by contributing to the concept explanation.
Images/Graphics

Quality
Poor

Many shots are out of focus and many shots need additional cropping. Shaky or unsteady camera work is distracting.
Fair

Most shots are in focus, but pictures need additional cropping. Some camera work is shaky or unsteady.
Good

Most shots are in focus and nicely cropped. Most camera work is smooth and steady.
Excellent

All shots are in focus and nicely cropped. The camera work is smooth and steady.
Images/Graphics

Originality
Poor

Copyright infringement is obvious.
Fair

Use of copyrighted works is problematic.
Good

All images and/or audio have either been created by the media producer or are copyright cleared. Appropriate evidence and documentation for copyright is missing.
Excellent

All images and/or audio was either created by the producer or have appropriate evidence and documentation for copyright clearance.
Content

Creativity and originality
Poor

No creative elements are included, or the types of creative elements used are inappropriate or distract from the content and/or purpose of the piece.
Fair

Creativity is lacking and doesn't enhance the content and/or purpose of the piece. Creative elements may distract from the content or purpose.
Good

Creative elements are included, but don't enhance the purpose of the piece. Creative elements don't distract from the content or purpose.
Excellent

Creativity and original content enhance the purpose of the piece in an innovative way.
Content

View
Poor

View is presented in a confusing manner AND there is little to no historical background of where it came from.
Fair

View is presented in a basic manner that may lack depth OR there is little to no historical background of where it came from.
Good

View is presented is acceptable though not detailed manner OR there is some historical background of where it came from.
Excellent

View covers topic in-depth, sharing lear, meaningful ideas backed with pertinent specific details explaining view and background. Subject knowledge is excellent.
Content

Biblical refereanes
Poor

Presentation lacked any Biblical references.
Fair

Presentation included some Bible verses or references.
Good

Presentation was mostly supported by Bible verses.
Excellent

Presentation was fully supported by relevant Bible verses and passages.
Content

Evaluation
Poor

View is not evaluated as complementary, discardable or a replacement for substitutionary view of Atonement.
Fair

View is mentioned as being complementary, discardable, or a replacement for substitutionary view for the atonment.
Good

View is mentioned and somewhat described as being complementary, discardable, or a replacement for substitutionary view of the atonement.
Excellent

View is clearly demonstrated as being complementary, discardable, or a replacement for substitutionary view of the atonement.
Group/Partner Work

Collaboration and participation
Poor

Some group members did not contribute to project ideas or discussions.
Fair

All group members contributed, but in unequal proportions. A few members did the majority of the work.
Good

Group members participated equally, but there was not much collaboration or sharing of ideas.
Excellent

Group members collaborated and participated equally in development of the project.
Group/Partner Work

Completion
Poor

Did not complete assigned work.
Fair

COmpleted some of the assigned work, but relied heavily on others to complete the project.
Good

Completed assigned work.
Excellent

Completed assigned tasks and shared insights and skills with the group.



Keywords:
  • Presentation

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98