- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Board Game and Final Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Board Game and Final Project Board Game and Final Project Create a board game that reflects aspects of the entire novel. Questions that show insight will earn higher marks than those that are simply recall questions. Your board game can be based on one that is already in existence such as Monopoly or Trivial Pursuit. The final project should include connections between the novel and other real world or fictional experiences, luminated plot points that show the plot progression, a list of vocabulary words from the novel and their definitions and character charts that reflect the major characters from the novel. Rubric Code: P57X3W By wmbush Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Board Game and Final Project
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Questions	Excellent Questions demonstrated considerable knowledge of the novel.	Good Questions demonstrated basic knowledge of the novel .	Fair Questions demonstrated limited knowledge of the novel.	Poor Questions demonstrate little understanding of the novel.
Design of bard game	Excellent Design is a clear representation of the novel's features, easy to play and rules are well written.	Good Design is partly representative of the novel's features, although it may be a tad confusing to play and rules are limited.	Fair Design is somewhat representative of the novel's features, the game is difficult to play and rules are poorly thought out or convoluted.	Poor Design is poor, with little or no relevance to topic. No rules or instructions evident.
Project presentation	Excellent Presentation is professional, eye-catching visually.	Good Presentation is partially professional. Visually the project is not attractive.	Fair Presentation is minimally acceptable.Project is not visually unattractive.	Poor Presentation is not acceptable/done.
Teamwork/Participation	Excellent The group worked very well with each other and the presentation was shared equally among the group members.	Good The group worked well with each other and communicated well/ Some members participated slightly more than others.	Fair The group communicated relatively well with a few lapses in the presentation; some students dominated the presentation and others did not participate much.	Poor Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications and lapses in the presentation.
Sections of the project	Excellent All sections are complete and neat. No mistakes found in any section.	Good All sections are mostly complete and neat. Few mistakes found in each section.	Fair All sections are partially complete and somewhat neat. Few mistakes found in each section.	Poor All sections are incomplete and not neat. More than five mistakes found in each section.