Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Agricultural Issues Forum rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Agricultural Issues Forum
FFA Conduct of Meetings
Rubric Code:
P5339C
By
teamaged
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Vocational
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Agricultural Issues Forum
Enter rubric description
Poor
(N/A)
Struggling
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Striving
(N/A)
Oustanding
(N/A)
Introduction of Issue
Introductory Statement of the Issue and its
importance to agriculture.
Poor
Introduction of the issue was NOT thorough. Pros and cons were not equally introduced.
Introduction of the issue was NOT thorough.
Pros and cons were NOT equally introduced.
Introduction was NOT concise.
(1 PTS.)
Struggling
Introduction of the issue was NOT thorough. Pros and cons were not equally introduced.
Introduction was NOT concise.
(2 PTS.)
Good
Introduction of the issue was thorough. Pros and cons were briefly explained. Pros and cons were NOT equally introduced.
Introduction was concise.
(3 PTS.)
Striving
Introduction of the issue was thorough. Pros and cons were equally introduced.
Introduction was NOT a concise as it could have been.
(4 PTS.)
Oustanding
Introduction of the issue was thorough. Pros and cons were equally introduced.
Introduction was understandable and concise.
(5 PTS.)
Pro View Point
Poor
Team made few or no accurate statements about the Pro-side of the issue as related to agriculture.
(1 PTS.)
Struggling
Team made a few accurate statements, and a few INACCURATE statements about the Pro-side of the issue as related to agriculture.
(2 PTS.)
Good
Team made a few accurate statements, and at least one INACCURATE statement about the Pro-side of the issue as related to agriculture.
(3 PTS.)
Striving
Team made a few accurate statements about the Pro-side of the issue as related to agriculture
(4 PTS.)
Oustanding
Team made several accurate AND concise statements about the Pro-side of the issue as related to agriculture.
(5 PTS.)
Con View Point
Poor
Team made few or no accurate statements about the Con-side of the issue as related to agriculture.
(1 PTS.)
Struggling
Team made a few accurate statements, and a few INACCURATE statements about the Con-side of the issue as related to agriculture.
(2 PTS.)
Good
Team made a few accurate statements, and at least one INACCURATE statement about the Con-side of the issue as related to agriculture.
(3 PTS.)
Striving
Team made a few accurate statements about the Con-side of the issue as related to agriculture
(4 PTS.)
Oustanding
Team made several accurate AND concise statements about the Con-side of the issue as related to agriculture.
(5 PTS.)
Summary of Pro and Con Viewpoints
Poor
Summary of the Pro and Con sides of the issue were NOT presented as related to agriculture.
Several opinions were expressed.
(1 pts.)
Struggling
Summary of the Pro and Con sides of the issue were NOT presented as related to agriculture.
One or more opinions were expressed.
(2 pts.)
Good
Summary of the Pro and Con sides of the issue were presented as related to agriculture.
One or more opinions were expressed.
(3 pts.)
Striving
Summary of the Pro and Con sides of the issue were presented as related to agriculture.
Expressed some implication of a conclusion. (4 pts.)
Oustanding
Summary of the Pro and Con sides of the issue were thoroughly and concisely presented as related to agriculture.
At no time did the team allow their opinion(s) to be expressed or no implication of a conclusion.
(5 pts.)
Documentation of Facts
Poor
No statements expressed as facts were documented by sources.
Al or most 'facts' were expressed as opinion.
(1 PTS.)
Struggling
Very few statements expressed as facts were documented by sources.
Several 'facts' were expressed as opinion.
(2 PTS.)
Good
A MINORITY of statements expressed as facts were documented by sources.
(3 PTS.)
Striving
A MAJORITY of statements expressed as facts were documented by sources.
(4 PTS.)
Oustanding
All statements expressed as facts were documented by sources.
(5 PTS.)
Voice and Expression
Poor
None of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Little of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(1-2 PTS.)
Struggling
Few of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Little of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(3-4 PTS.)
Good
Some of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Some of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(5-6 PTS.)
Striving
Most of the team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Most of the discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(7-8 PTS.)
Oustanding
All team members spoke clearly and strongly with little confusion or repetition. Discussion is logical and relevant to the item of business.
(9-10 PTS.)
Questions
Poor
Answered few or no questions correctly.
Did not respond without significant hesitation.
(1 PTS.)
Struggling
Answered most questions correctly.
Responded with significant hesitation.
(2 PTS.)
Good
Answered most questions correctly.
Responded with some hesitation.
(3 PTS.)
Striving
Answered most questions correctly.
Responded with little hesitation.
(4 PTS.)
Oustanding
Answered all questions correctly.
Responded with no hesitation.
(5 PTS.)
Subjects:
Vocational
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Vocational rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.